1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irina [24]
3 years ago
7

What is the answer to this?​

Mathematics
1 answer:
myrzilka [38]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:r=3cm,diameter =6cm and C=18.84cm

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the radius,diameter and circumference according to the diagram drawn above

r=3cm

Diameter=2×3cm

d=6cm

To find the circumference

C=2πr

C=2×3.14×3cm

C=18.84cm

You might be interested in
What would 23 divided by 6 = 3 R5 look as a mixed number?
masha68 [24]
23/6 = 3 and 5/6. You would just put the remainder over the number you divided by
7 0
3 years ago
he price of a pair of shoes increases from $68 to $77. What is the percent increase to the nearest percent?
tekilochka [14]

Answer:

an increase of 12%

Step-by-step explanation:

68 divided by 77 is 0.88 approximately

100-88 is 12

Tip:

do this for increase and decrease in percentage question

divide small number by big number, and subtract the quotient from 100

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
At her job, mary works 4 hours on monday, 3 hours on wednesday, and 6 hours on saturday. her boss adds a $10 bonus to her payche
Andru [333]
She worked 4+3+6 hours = 13 hoursso 13x+10 = 120.50
13x=110.50
x=8.5
so she makes $8.50 an hour which is A.
8 0
3 years ago
The CPA Practice Advisor reports that the mean preparation fee for 2017 federal income tax returns was $273. Use this price as t
skad [1K]

Answer:

a) 0.6212 = 62.12% probability that the mean price for a sample of 30 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean.

b) 0.7416 = 74.16% probability that the mean price for a sample of 50 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean.

c) 0.8804 = 88.04% probability that the mean price for a sample of 100 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean.

d) None of them ensure, that one which comes closer is a sample size of 100 in option c), to guarantee, we need to keep increasing the sample size.

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.

Normal Probability Distribution

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean \mu and standard deviation \sigma, the z-score of a measure X is given by:

Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean \mu and standard deviation \sigma, the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean \mu and standard deviation s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}.

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

The CPA Practice Advisor reports that the mean preparation fee for 2017 federal income tax returns was $273. Use this price as the population mean and assume the population standard deviation of preparation fees is $100.

This means that \mu = 273, \sigma = 100

A) What is the probability that the mean price for a sample of 30 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean?

Sample of 30 means that n = 30, s = \frac{100}{\sqrt{30}}

The probability is the p-value of Z when X = 273 + 16 = 289 subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 273 - 16 = 257. So

X = 289

Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}

By the Central Limit Theorem

Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}

Z = \frac{289 - 273}{\frac{100}{\sqrt{30}}}

Z = 0.88

Z = 0.88 has a p-value of 0.8106

X = 257

Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}

Z = \frac{257 - 273}{\frac{100}{\sqrt{30}}}

Z = -0.88

Z = -0.88 has a p-value of 0.1894

0.8106 - 0.1894 = 0.6212

0.6212 = 62.12% probability that the mean price for a sample of 30 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean.

B) What is the probability that the mean price for a sample of 50 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean?

Sample of 30 means that n = 50, s = \frac{100}{\sqrt{50}}

X = 289

Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}

By the Central Limit Theorem

Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}

Z = \frac{289 - 273}{\frac{100}{\sqrt{50}}}

Z = 1.13

Z = 1.13 has a p-value of 0.8708

X = 257

Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}

Z = \frac{257 - 273}{\frac{100}{\sqrt{50}}}

Z = -1.13

Z = -1.13 has a p-value of 0.1292

0.8708 - 0.1292 = 0.7416

0.7416 = 74.16% probability that the mean price for a sample of 50 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean.

C) What is the probability that the mean price for a sample of 100 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean?

Sample of 30 means that n = 100, s = \frac{100}{\sqrt{100}}

X = 289

Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}

By the Central Limit Theorem

Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}

Z = \frac{289 - 273}{\frac{100}{\sqrt{100}}}

Z = 1.6

Z = 1.6 has a p-value of 0.9452

X = 257

Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}

Z = \frac{257 - 273}{\frac{100}{\sqrt{100}}}

Z = -1.6

Z = -1.6 has a p-value of 0.0648

0.9452 - 0.0648 =

0.8804 = 88.04% probability that the mean price for a sample of 100 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean.

D) Which, if any of the sample sizes in part (a), (b), and (c) would you recommend to ensure at least a .95 probability that the same mean is withing $16 of the population mean?

None of them ensure, that one which comes closer is a sample size of 100 in option c), to guarantee, we need to keep increasing the sample size.

6 0
2 years ago
What is the answer to page 156-157 on chapter 4 proportions relationship.
timurjin [86]
Proportional relationships<span>: A </span>relationship<span> between two equal ratios. Proportions are the comparison of two equal ratios. Therefore, </span>proportionalrelationships<span> are </span>relationships<span> between two equal ratios. For example, oranges are sold in a bag of 5 for $2. The ratio of oranges to their cost is 5:2 or.</span><span>In mathematics, two variables are proportional if a change in one is always accompanied by a change in the other, and if the changes are always related by use of a constant multiplier. The constant is called the coefficient of proportionality or proportionality constant.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What's equivalent to 2/3 with a denominator of 15
    5·1 answer
  • Nikita calculated the volume of the right triangular prism. Her work is shown below. A triangular prism. The triangular base has
    6·2 answers
  • Simplify the following expression by combining like terms.
    15·1 answer
  • A recipe for 40 biscuits uses 2 cups of biscuit mix. How many biscuits are made from 1 cup of biscuit mix?​
    5·2 answers
  • Solve the equation for X.
    12·1 answer
  • If N || P and P bisects M then _____ (13)
    7·1 answer
  • Steve has $5. Nancy has 250% as much money as Steve. How much money does Nancy have?
    15·2 answers
  • Can someone help me with this
    11·2 answers
  • Dilbert invests a total of $26,000 in two accounts paying 14% and 2% annual interest, respectively. How much was invested in eac
    7·1 answer
  • Suppose the shipping weight of your cheese shop's customized gift baskets is asymmetrically distributed with unknown mean and st
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!