Answer:
For this case we have by definition, that an irrational number is a number that can not be expressed as a fraction \ frac {a} {b}, where a and b are integers and b is different from zero.
A) , it is rational
B), it is rational
C) , it is rational
D) it is not rational.
Step-by-step explanation:
dddddd its dddd
BESTI ILYSM
For proof of 3 divisibility, abc is a divisible by 3 if the sum of abc (a + b + c) is a multiple of 3.
<h3>
Integers divisible by 3</h3>
The proof for divisibility of 3 implies that an integer is divisible by 3 if the sum of the digits is a multiple of 3.
<h3>Proof for the divisibility</h3>
111 = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 (the sum is multiple of 3 = 3 x 1) (111/3 = 37)
222 = 2 + 2 + 2 = 6 (the sum is multiple of 3 = 3 x 2) (222/3 = 74)
213 = 2 + 1 + 3 = 6 ( (the sum is multiple of 3 = 3 x 2) (213/3 = 71)
27 = 2 + 7 = 9 (the sum is multiple of 3 = 3 x 3) (27/3 = 9)
Thus, abc is a divisible by 3 if the sum of abc (a + b + c) is a multiple of 3.
Learn more about divisibility here: brainly.com/question/9462805
#SPJ1
Answer:
x=y
Step-by-step explanation:
let x be the number of tennis balls and y the number of rackets.
-We divide the number of balls by the number of rackets to find out their ratio of proportionality:

-Hence, for each one ball there is one racket, so;

-This relationship is linear in nature, a direct variation, and can be graphed as attached below:
You have to use the quadratic formula to solve this. The zeros of this quadratic are 2 + sqrt2/2 and 2 - sqrt2/2, which in "real" numbers is 1.707 and .2928