Answer:
c. It should process further because the reduction in the cost of the trees is irrelevant.
Explanation:
For the purpose of this Decision,
Benefit of processing further = Sales Value after processing – Sale Value before processing – Further Processing costs
Cost of acquiring trees is a sunk cost already incurred and hence is not relevant
Hence, benefit of processing = (0.80-0.20)*350 – 50
= $160
Hence, the answer is
c. It should process further because the reduction in the cost of the trees is irrelevant.
Answer:
Bank Reconciliation Statement as at October 2:
Balance as per checkbook $601
Add: Electronic transfer $2,400
Interest $4
Less: Bank charge ($5)
Balance as per bank statement $3,000
Explanation:
A bank reconciliation statement is a statement prepared periodically to reconcile the balance in the cash book with the balance shown on a bank statement.
The process starts with identifying transactions that do not (do) appear in the cash book and those that do not (do) appear in the bank statement, which did not appear in the other. Errors are also identified and corrected during the process. After this, the reconciliation statement is prepared to agree the two sources of balances.
Routine purchases may only require internal information search, whereas one-time high expense purchases require more external information search time.
<h3>What is
Routine purchases?</h3>
The routine purchases are one that people make to seek for little decision-making, however this purchases are made with “programmed behavior.
Hence , Routine purchases may only require internal information search, whereas one-time high expense purchases require more external information search time.
Find out more on Routine purchases at brainly.com/question/26242633
#SPJ1
Answer:
1. Neither ; 2. Consumer Surplus ; 3. Producer Surplus
Explanation:
Consumer Surplus is the difference between a good's price paid by consumer, & maximum price the consumer is willing to pay for the good.
Producer Surplus is the difference between a good's price received by a seller, & minimum price at which the seller is willing to sell the good.
1. Willing to pay $209 for watch, buyer willing to sell at $196, no trade as price ceiling at $190 : It illustrates neither concept as transaction has not actually occurred, so no price established.
2. Willing to pay $39 for sweater, purchased it for $32 : It illustrates 'Consumer Surplus' case = $7 , as it shows difference between maximum willingness to pay by buyer ($39) & the actual buy price ($32)
3. Willing to sell laptop at $190, sold it at $199 : It illustrates 'Producer Surplus' case = $9 , as it shows difference between minimum willingness to sell price ($190) & actual sale price ($199)
