When I to marketing class at my school I was able to highlight the cell and move it. So i think it is True.
True I think I am not 100% sure
A family day care allows you to make money while caring for your own children
Answer:
a. The total profit would be positively affected as it increases
Explanation:
1. We calculate the value of revenue per 8000 gallons with the initial chemical compound and processed into the new variant
Revenue Initial Chemical Compound= 8000 gallons X ($52/gallon)
Revenue Initial Chemical Compound=<em><u> $ 416.000</u></em>
Revenue Chemical compound processed into the new variant=8000 gallons X ($83/gallon)
Revenue Chemical compound processed into the new variant= <u><em>$ 664.000</em></u>
2. If we consider that the other production costs will be the same for the two chemical compounds, then the only difference will be the processing cost to refine the basic compound into the new variant. For this reason, we substract only the value of processing the basic compound into the new variant for the revenue of this.
<u><em>$ 664.000 - $160.000= $504.000</em></u>
3. The benefit values for each case are:
Initial Chemical Compound: $416.000
Chemical compound processed into the new variant: $504.000
In conclusion, greater benefit is obtained by processing the basic compound in the new variant than if the basic compound were sold only
Answer:
$3
$2
$1
False
Explanation:
The burden of tax refers to who pays the tax between the buyer and the seller.
More burden of tax usually falls to the party with the more inelastic demand because the quantity demanded would not change despite the increase in price as a result of the tax.
To find the amount of tax per bottle = price of wine - amount received by producers = $6 - $3 = $3
The amount paid by consumers = price after tax - price before tax = $6 - $4 = $2
Amount received by sellers = tax- amount paid by consumers = $3 - $2 = $1
It can be seen that consumers bear a higher burden of tax because they pay the greater tax. This means they have an inelastic demand.
If the tax had been levied on producers, the effect on quantity demanded would have been greater because producers have a more less elastic supply when compared to consumers .
I hope my answer helps you
