Answer:
True The grid with more slits gives more angle separation increases
True. The grating with 10 slits produces better-defined (narrower) peaks
Explanation:
Such a system can be seen as a diffraction network in this case with different number of lines per unit length, the expression for the constructive interference of a diffraction network is
d sin θ = m λ
where d is the distance between slits or lines, m the order of diffraction and λ the wavelength.
For network with 5 slits
d = 1/5 = 0.2
For the network with 10 slits
d = 1/10 = 0.1
let's calculate the separation (teat) for each one
θ = sin⁻¹ (m λ / d)
for 5 slits
θ₅ = sin⁻¹ (m λ 5)
for 10 slits
θ₁₀ = sin⁻¹ (m λ 10)
we can appreciate that for more slits the angle increases
the intensity of a series of slits is
I = I₀ sin²2 (N d/2) / sin² d/2)
when there are more slits (N) the peaks have greater intensity and are more acute (half width decreases)
let's analyze the claims
False
True The grid with more slits gives more angle separation increases
False
True The expression for the intensity of the diffraction peaks the intensity of the peaks increases with the number of slits as well as their spectral width decreases
False
let us consider that the two charges are of opposite nature .hence they will constitute a dipole .the separation distance is given as d and magnitude of each charges is q.
the mathematical formula for potential is 
for positive charges the potential is positive and is negative for negative charges.
the formula for electric field is given as-
for positive charges,the line filed is away from it and for negative charges the filed is towards it.
we know that on equitorial line the potential is zero.hence all the points situated on the line passing through centre of the dipole and perpendicular to the dipole length is zero.
here the net electric field due to the dipole can not be zero between the two charges,but we can find the points situated on the axial line but outside of charges where the electric field is zero.
now let the two charges of same nature.let these are positively charged.
here we can not find a point between two charges and on the line joining two charges where the potential is zero.
but at the mid point of the line joining two charges the filed is zero.
Answer:
v=s/t
s=vt
t=s/v
t=(120×10‐³)/172.8
(the distance meters has been changed to kilometres)
t=1/1440 hrs
Given ,
You have no options here so I'll just answer. It can cause a rise in heart rate and greatly increases the risk of overheating and even death. If you grab the rabbit too hard, you risk breaking/fracturing a bone or causing other kinds of damage, whether externally or internally, to the rabbit.
1). trajectory
2). person sitting in a chair
3). 490 meters
4). 65 m/s
5). False. The projectile's displacement, velocity, and acceleration have vertical and horizontal components, but the projectile doesn't.
6). False
7). The vertical component of a projectile doesn't change due to gravity, but the vertical components of its displacement, velocity, and acceleration do.
The vertical components do NOT equal the horizontal components.
8). Decreasing if you include the effects of air resistance. Constant if you don't. Gravity has no effect on horizontal velocity.
9). We can't see the simulation. But if the projectile doesn't have jets on it, then as it travels upward, its vertical velocity must decrease, because gravity is trying to not let it get away.
10). We can't see the simulation. But if the projectile is traveling downward, we would call that "falling", and its vertical velocity must increase, because gravity is pulling it downward.
