See the picture attached to better understand the problem
we know that
If two secant segments are drawn to a <span>circle </span><span>from an exterior point, then the product of the measures of one secant segment and its external secant segment is equal to the product of the measures of the other secant segment and its external secant segment.
</span>so
jl*jk=jn*jm------> jn=jl*jk/jm
we have
<span>jk=8,lk=4 and jm=6
</span>jl=8+4----> 12
jn=jl*jk/jm-----> jn=12*8/6----> jn=16
the answer isjn=16
Explanation:
using the parabola formula:
y = a(x-h)² + k²
vertex = (h, k)
We are given a parebola equation of: y = x²+9
comparing both equations to get the vertex:
y = y
a = 1
(x-h)² = x²
x² = (x + 0)²
(x-h)² = (x + 0)²
h = 0
+k = +9
k = 9
The vertex of the parabola as (x, y): (0, 9)
Answer:
D. 314 yds
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
Diameter = 100 yds
Required;
Circumference of the circle
Solution:
Circumference of circle = πd
Plug in the value
Circumference = π × 100
= 314 yds (nearest whole number)
Answer:
From 10 a.m. to 2 p.m., the temperature at Sam's house increased by 8 degrees Fahrenheit.
Step-by-step explanation:
Write as a number equation ----> 2 - (-6) = 8
Answer:
The equation does not have a real root in the interval ![\rm [0,1]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Crm%20%5B0%2C1%5D)
Step-by-step explanation:
We can make use of the intermediate value theorem.
The theorem states that if
is a continuous function whose domain is the interval [a, b], then it takes on any value between f(a) and f(b) at some point within the interval. There are two corollaries:
- If a continuous function has values of opposite sign inside an interval, then it has a root in that interval. This is also known as Bolzano's theorem.
- The image of a continuous function over an interval is itself an interval.
Of course, in our case, we will make use of the first one.
First, we need to proof that our function is continues in
, which it is since every polynomial is a continuous function on the entire line of real numbers. Then, we can apply the first corollary to the interval
, which means to evaluate the equation in 0 and 1:

Since both values have the same sign, positive in this case, we can say that by virtue of the first corollary of the intermediate value theorem the equation does not have a real root in the interval
. I attached a plot of the equation in the interval
where you can clearly observe how the graph does not cross the x-axis in the interval.