Answer:
Let first no. be x
Therefore,
2nd no. is x+1
Third no. is x+2
<em><u>SUM</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>OF</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>NO</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>'</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>=</u></em><em><u>x</u></em><em><u>+</u></em><em><u>x</u></em><em><u>+</u></em><em><u>1</u></em><em><u>+</u></em><em><u>x</u></em><em><u>+</u></em><em><u>2</u></em>
<em><u>S</u></em><em><u>=</u></em><em><u>3x</u></em><em><u>+</u></em><em><u>3</u></em>
<em><u>S</u></em><em><u>=</u></em><em><u>3</u></em><em><u>(</u></em><em><u>x</u></em><em><u>+</u></em><em><u>1</u></em><em><u>)</u></em>
Answer:
3
Step-by-step explanation:
Wavelength is usually denoted as letter lambda (λ); it is equal to the speed (v) of a wave train in a medium divided by its frequency (f): λ = v/f. Waves of different wavelengths.
formula: λ = v/f
solution: λ= 30m/s / 10Hz
= 3
Correct Question:
Tim is investigating the relationship between the number of years since a tree was planted and the height of the tree in feet. His data are shown in the table. Years Since Tree was Planted vs. Height of Tree
Years since the tree was planted, x
Height of tree in feet, y
2, 17, 3, 25, 5, 42, 6, 47, 7, 54, 9, 69
Using a regression calculator, what is a good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old?
Answer/explanation:
There is no good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old. If you analyze careful in details the regression calculator you realize that it probably will not valid that far in to the future say 100 years.
Two hundred ten thousand and fifty is written as 210,050
Nineteen-hundredths is written as 19/100 or 0.19
So, the whole number is written as 210050.19
9514 1404 393
Answer:
no feasible solutions
Step-by-step explanation:
There are so many inequalities that determining the area covered by all 5 of them is problematic. Hence, we have reversed all of them in the attached graph, so any feasible solution region would remain white. Alas, there is no such region.
This system of inequalities has <em>no feasible solution</em>.