Answer:The result indicates that they women placed in the high-dissonance condition were more likely than the women placed in the other two conditions to escalate the attractiveness of the chosen alternative to be more captivating and to decrease the attractiveness of the unchosen option.
Explanation: The result seems to show that we tend to place more priority to the items which have considerable effort to achieve. The participants I placed in the high dissonance condition spread the alternatives in a significant way, while the participants in the other two other separate conditions go the opposite way.
<span>He was trying to make Washington into a role model for the people at that time. People wanted to know about Washington’s private life, and by constructing this story, he was trying to create a positive leader that people could look up to.</span>
The answer is True
Explanation: The Indian Removal Act was a law signed in 1830, authorizing the president to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders.
Answer: Social vs relational
Explanation:
Jerry transgressed the rule by allowing Lola have the leash in her mouth. It was agreed that who gets home first controls the dog but this scenario played out by Jerry made it be a social vs relational scenario.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "In-Group Collectivism".
Explanation:
- In-group collectivism becomes "the extent to which entities within their organizations or families demonstrate loyalty, pride, and cohesiveness"
- As certain, relational collectivism is expressed as an ideology in which collective unity is valuable and participants within the group are viewed as having equal representation.
Therefore, it's the right answer.
