All categories

2 years ago

What is the answer to 2(x - 5 + 2) = 6

Mathematics

2 answers:

kramer2 years ago

5 0

2(x-5+2)=6
2x-10+4=6
2x-6=6
2x=12
X=6
The answer is 6

Alex777 [14]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

x=6

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Simplify x-5+2x−5+2 to x-3x−3.

2(x-3)=6

2. Divide both sides by 2.

x−3=6/2

3 Simplify 6/2 to 3.t

x-3=3x−3=3

4 Add 3 to both sides.

x=3+3

5 Simplify 3+3 to 6.

x=6

You might be interested in

(01.01)

Anit [1.1K]

Answer:

11, but see below.

Step-by-step explanation:

I don't see the entire equation. The value of 3^2 + (8-2) - 4 is 11. If there is another number after the 4 (I see a "-," but nothing else), it must be added/subtracted from 11.

3 0

2 years ago

Carbon 14 (14C) dating assumes that the carbon dioxide on Earth today has the same radioactive content as it did centuries ago.

pychu [463]

You can download answer here

tinyurl.com/wpazsebu

8 0

2 years ago

How do u solve x-y=3 6x+4y=13

earnstyle [38]

X - y = 3
6x + 4y = 13

x = y + 3

6(y + 3) + 4y = 13
6y + 18 + 4y = 13
10y = 13 - 18
10y = - 5
y = - 5/10
y = - 1/2

x = - 1/2 + 3
x = - 1/2 + 6/2
x = 5/2

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the measure of ABC

Pavel [41]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

It is the only one that makes sense.

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

△JKL is mapped to △J'K'L' using the rules (x, y)→(x+2, y+3) followed by (x, y)→(2x, y) .

MissTica

Answer:

A. ΔJKL is not congruent to ΔJ'K'L' because the rules do not represent a sequence of rigid motions.

Step-by-step explanation:

ΔJKL is mapped to ΔJ'K'L' using the rules $(x, y)\rightarrow (x+2, y+3)$ followed by $(x, y)\rightarrow (2x, y)$

From geometry we know while rotating, reflecting and translating the size of the figure remains as it is, so they are congruent.

But in case of dilation the figure gets resized i.e their size gets changed. So they are similar not congruent.

In this case, first the triangle goes under $(x, y)\rightarrow (x+2, y+3)$ i.e 2 units translated to right and 3 units translated to up.

But after then it undergoes $(x, y)\rightarrow (2x, y)$ , where it undergoes a dilation of factor 2, so it is no more congruent to the original figure.

4 0

2 years ago