Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
we have
<em>Find the amount of money that each girl spent</em>
For t= 2 hours
<em>Find the amount of money that they spend together</em>
Multiply by 2 the amount of money that each girl spent
A common misconception in statistics is confusing correlation with causation. If two events are correlated, it merely means that they share the same behaviour over time, but it doesn't imply in any way that those event are related by a common cause, or even worse, that one implies the other.
You can find several (even humorous) counter examples online. For example, if you plot the number of reported pirates assault against the global temperature in the last years, you'll se that temperature is rising (unfortunately...) while pirates are almost disappearing.
One could observe this strong negative correlation and claim that hotter climate has solved the pirate issue. Of course this is a joke, but it explains why you shouldn't confuse correlation with causation.
Answer:
d) (179.20, 212.716)
Step-by-step explanation:
1000 : 345
569 : 195.96
Midpoint of (179.20, 212.716) is 195.958 which is the closest to 195.96
Answer: whats the answer
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
y=-9/2x-10
Step-by-step explanation:
m=(y2-y1)/(x2-x1)
m=(-1-8)/(-2-(-4))
m=-9/(-2+4)
m=-9/2
y-y1=m(x-x1)
y-8=-9/2(x-(-4))
y-8=-9/2(x+4)
y=-9/2x-36/2+8
y=-9/2x-18+8
y=-9/2x-10
