You can write the equation in 3 different ways, depending on which quantity you want to be the dependent variable. Any one of the three forms can be derived from either of the other two with a simple algebra operation. They're all the same relationship, described by "Ohm's Law".
==> Current = (potential difference) / (resistance)
==> Potential difference = (current) x (resistance)
==> Resistance = (potential difference) / (resistance)
It is False that, If f '(c) = 0, then f has a local maximum or minimum at c.
Local maximum and minimum points are very distinctive on the graph of a function and are thus, helpful in grasping the shape of the graph. Either a local minimum or a local maximum can be considered a local extremum.
A counterexample can be used for:
f(x) = x³
f'(x) = 2 × x²
and,
f'(0) = 2×0² = 0
However, the assertion is false because x = 0 is actually an inflection point rather than a maximum or minimum in f(x) = x³.
Know more about f(x) here: brainly.com/question/28058540
#SPJ4
Answer: 99.64 nm (≅ 100 nm)
Explanation: In order to explain this problem we have to obtain destructive inteference from two waves that reflect in the film and lens surface so both waves have a λ/2 shift then we have to get a difference path (2L) equal to an odd number of the half wavelegth.
Then we have the following expression:
L=(m+1/2)* λ/(2*n2); where n2 is the refractive index of the coating
for m=0 we have the minimum thickness for the coating
L=λ/(4*n2)=99.64 nm (≅ 100 nm)
Answer: 0.064 m/s²
Explanation:
Initial velocity = 22m/s
Final velocity = 44m/s
Time taken = 345 seconds
Acceleration = (Final velocity - Initial velocity) / Time taken
= (44 - 22) / 345
= 22/345
= 0.0637681
= 0.064 m/s²
Therefore, the acceleration is 0.064 m/s².
