1.The Trans-Arabian Pipeline Company was a company created as joint venture by Standard Oil of New Jersey, the Socony-Vacuum Oil Company, the Texas Company and the Standard Oil of California in order to run and build the Trans-Arabian Pipeline.
2.Basically it shut down due to various political and economic reasons. The part of the pipeline was after the six-day war under the control of Israel, but they allowed it to function. The constant bickering over transit fees between Syria, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon and the pipeline breakdowns as well as the development of bigger oil tankers led to the closing of the portion of the pipeline. Saudi Arabia closed the rest after Jordan supported Iraq in the first Gulf War. The company became the subsidiary of Aramco and as the oil stopped flowing Aramco closed the subsidiary.
The answer is c. If they printed more money it makes it worth less
Answer:
This chapter provides a historical framework for consideration of today’s debates over privatization. Changes in policies and practices are never free of the inertia of history. Some of the key pressures for change today have resulted from past action (or inaction), and today’s practices have evolved from specific problem-solving histories.
Efforts to provide safe drinking water and wastewater disposal facilities date back to the origins of civilization (Rosen, 1993; Winslow, 1952). Ancient societies in Egypt, Mesopotamia, India, Pakistan, Crete, and Greece all sought to provide safe drinking water and safe means of human waste disposal. Water supply and wastewater collection reached a high point in the Roman Empire. The Dark Ages, however, witnessed a decline in the development and application of these practices.
As world population neared one billion during the Industrial Revolution in the late nineteenth century, cities and villages became more crowded. Public health concerns dictated that new ways had to be found to provide safe water supplies as well as provide means for safe disposal of sanitary wastes. Growth in the numbers and in the size of cities and increasing use of water in residential, commercial, and industrial enterprises led to increasing provision of public systems for water supply and wastewater systems. Although some research suggests that private water companies emerged during the Renaissance (Walker, 1968), private entrepreneurs initiated the provision of water supply services on a large scale during the nineteenth century in both Europe and the United States. By contrast, provision of sewers, along with streets and drainage facilities,
Explanation:
No.
As a charged isn't constrained to give prove in a criminal antagonistic continuing, they may not be addressed by a prosecutor or judge unless they do as such. Be that as it may, should they choose to affirm, they are liable to round of questioning and could be discovered liable of prevarication. As the race to keep up a charged individual's entitlement to quiet keeps any examination or round of questioning of that individual's position, it takes after that the choice of advice in the matter of what proof will be called is an essential strategy regardless in the ill-disposed framework and thus it may be said that it is a legal counselor's control of reality. Surely, it requires the aptitudes of insight on the two sides to be decently similarly hollowed and subjected to an unbiased judge.
By differentiate, while litigants in most affable law frameworks can be constrained to give an announcement, this announcement isn't liable to round of questioning by the prosecutor and not given under vow. This enables the litigant to clarify his side of the case without being liable to round of questioning by a talented resistance. Notwithstanding, this is predominantly on the grounds that it isn't the prosecutor yet the judges who question the respondent. The idea of "cross"- examination is altogether due to antagonistic structure of the customary law.
Judges in an antagonistic framework are unprejudiced in guaranteeing the reasonable play of due process, or basic equity. Such judges choose, regularly when called upon by advise as opposed to of their own movement, what confirm is to be conceded when there is a debate; however in some customary law wards judges assume to a greater extent a part in choosing what confirmation to concede into the record or reject. Best case scenario, mishandling legal carefulness would really make ready to a one-sided choice, rendering out of date the legal procedure being referred to—run of law being illegally subordinated by lead of man under such separating conditions.
It is <u>true </u>that a <em>dictator </em>generally takes and keeps his power by force.
<h3>Who is a dictator? </h3>
A dictator is generally seen in political leaders who have the intention of controlling and ruling the nation by eliminating any<u> opposition leader</u> interference.
Therefore, this authority is gained through <u>power</u> and <u>military force</u> in order to maintain their supremacy.
Learn more about dictators here:
brainly.com/question/2734562
