The least-square regression line has a slope of:
m=(nΣxy-ΣyΣx)/(nΣx²-ΣxΣx)
and a y-intercept of:
b=(Σy-mΣx)/n
In this case: n=7, Σxy=4899, Σy=391, Σx=85, Σx²=1153 so
m=(7(4899)-391*85)/(7(1153)-85*85))=1058/846
b=(391*846-85*1058)/(7*846)=34408/846
So the line of best fit is:
y=(1058x+34408)/846 and if we approximated this as your answers see to have done....
y=1.25x+40.67
Answer:
- f^-1(x) = (3/8)(x +1) . . . . as written
- f^-1(x) = (x +5)/(3x -1) . . . with appropriate parentheses
Step-by-step explanation:
The inverse function can be found by solving for y:
x = f(y)
x = y + 5/3y -1 . . . . . . . . . . y +(5/3)y -1 . . . per order of operations
x+1 = 8/3y . . . . . . . . . . add 1
(3/8)(x +1) = y . . . . . . . . multiply by 3/8
f^-1(x) = (3/8)(x +1) . . . . . inverse of the function as written
_____
Perhaps you intend f(x) = (x+5)/(3x-1). The inverse is found the same way.
x = (y +5)/(3y -1)
x(3y -1) = y +5
3xy -x = y +5 . . . . . eliminate parentheses
3xy -y = x + 5 . . . . . add x-y
y(3x -1) = x +5 . . . . . factor out y
y = (x +5)/(3x -1) . . . divide by the coefficient of y
f^-1(x) = (x +5)/(3x -1) . . . . inverse of rational function
Answer:Solve equations by clearing the Denominators Find the least common denominator of all the fractions in the equation. Multiply both sides of the equation by that LCD. This clears the fractions.
Step-by-step explanation:Solve equations by clearing the Denominators Find the least common denominator of all the fractions in the equation. Multiply both sides of the equation by that LCD. This clears the fractions.
For two triangles to be congruent by AAS:
1- Two angles in the first triangle must be equal to two angles in the second triangle
2- A non included side in the first triangle is equal to a non included side in the second triangle
Now, let's check our options. We will find that:
For the two triangles UTV and ABC:
angle T = angle A
angle V = angle C
TU (non-included between angles T & V) = AB (non-included between angles A & C)
Therefore, we can conclude that:
Triangles ABC and UTV are congruent by AAS
Lets say that Maggie works 5 hours just the same as Braxton. if we use h(x)=f(x)+g(x) they would make about $100 combined. having to split that Braxton would make less then what he originally. since 9(5)+10= 55 and 6(5)+15=45. but if say Maggie works more then 5 hours then Braxton will be more money then just working alone.
