Answer:
Katie is not cheating. From the question, it sounds like Katie's spinner is 1-12. James has two dice so he has two sets of each number 1-6. This means that Katie can roll two numbers greater than six but James can only roll up to six. Using probability, I think there is a 50% chance that Katie's number will be bigger than James every time she spins. A fairer way would be for them both to play with the same dice or spinner.
Step-by-step explanation:
$1059.83 Use this formula:

P=principal of 519
r= your rate of 4.2% as a decimal
n=number of compounding periods; yours is daily or 365 day in a year.
t=time involved of the investment in years; yours is 17
The spinner is divided into four equal sections: 2, 4, 7, 9. This represents 4 possibilities
If the spinner is spun twice, the sample space is:

For product less than 30, the number of outcomes is shown below:
The number of outcomes that have a product less than 30 = 10
The sample space that shows possibilities of an odd number combination:
The number of outcomes that contains at least one odd number = 12
The number of outcomes that have a product less than 30 and contain at least one odd number is shown below. These outcomes are outcomes circled in both cases shown above,
The outcomes circled represents the number of outcomes that has a product less than 30 and contains at least one odd number
Answer: 6 (option B)
0.0044 as a percentage0.44%
9514 1404 393
Answer:
about $171,400
Step-by-step explanation:
William's total monthly debt is ...
$1012.84 +579.13 +250 +300 = 2141.97
On an annual basis, this is ...
12 × $2141.97 = $25,703.64
This will be 15% of (25703.64/0.15) = $171,357.60.
William's new annual salary should be about $171,400 to keep his debt ratio at the recommended 15%.
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
A debt ratio of 15% is a pretty aggressive target. Most mortgage lenders like to see the "front end" ratio (housing expense) less than 28%, and the "back end" ratio (all debt) less than 36%.