All categories

2 years ago

Read the following excerpt from Federalist #14 by James

Social Studies

2 answers:

cricket20 [7]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

preventing individual states from having their own currencies.

Explanation:

In the text shown above, Madison discourages allowing individual currencies for each state. He believes that this would weaken trade in the union, in addition to creating strife between the trade established between the states, which would be highly damaging to the country as a whole.

According to Madison, the ideal would be for a single currency to be established throughout the union, this could be done with the ratification of the constitution, which would establish the poribition of individual currencies for each state, but a national currency that should be used by everyone in the territory national.

worty [1.4K]2 years ago

5 0

Preventing individual states from having their own currency.

Explanation: Edgenuity 2020

You might be interested in

When Georgia was a Royal colony, how were members of the Governor's Council chosen? (SS8H2d) A They were elected by the voters.

steposvetlana [31]

<span>12 members were appointed by the King (prominent wealthy landowners) because the king controlled Georgia when it became a royal colony. Hope this helped!</span>

7 0

3 years ago

What organization did the Pendleton Act establish? It created the Reading Railroad Commission. It prevented corruption in big bu

deff fn [24]

The answer is IT STARTED THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If the jurisdiction for a case falls only with the state or federal court, but not both, then the case is considered

PilotLPTM [1.2K]

<em>I think it might be D.concurrent Because two concurrent courts of law.</em>

<em>accordant or agreeing: concurrent testimony by three witnesses.</em>

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A school wants to buy a chalkboard that measures 1 meter by 2 meters. The chalkboard costs $19.00 per square meter. How much wil

Otrada [13]

Answer

57.00

Explanation:

Mr.cheese is just right

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If a government that previously had no limits on what it could do to its citizens was overthrown and replaced with a government

timofeeve [1]

When a government without limits to the extent of its power is overthrown and a new government founded with strict procedural limits to its power is installed, such a shift would be characterized as a shift from an absolute monarchy (Autocracy) to democracy

<h3>What is An absolute Monarchy?</h3>

Absolute monarchy is a type of monarchy where the monarch wields absolute authority to govern, and hence, rules as the sovereign government's head of state with no limitations on the power of the monarch over the state (subject)

<h3>What is a Democracy?</h3>

A democracy is a form of government where the people have the authority to elect governing officials and they also have the power to carry out their own legislation

Learn more about forms of government at brainly.com/question/18862016.

5 0

2 years ago