1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Luba_88 [7]
3 years ago
7

Butcher Co. sold 10,000 toys in Year4 for $20 each. The company expects that 5% of the toys will be returned under warranty for

a refund of the sales price in the 2-year warranty period. There were $6,000 of warranty obligations paid in cash during Year4. What is Butcher's warranty expense for Year4?
Business
1 answer:
algol133 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Butcher's warranty expense for Year 4 is $10,000

Explanation:

Since in the question, it is given that 5% of the toys are returned, and the warranty expenses should be charged on the replacement service or repair service. Even, the question has said the same.

So, the warranty expense computation is shown below:

= Sale units of toys × selling price per toy × returned percentage

= 10,000 toys × $20 × 5%

= $10,000

The warranty obligation part is irrelevant. Thus, we don't consider in the computation part. Therefore, it is ignored.

Hence, Butcher's warranty expense for Year 4 is $10,000

You might be interested in
Students will write a thorough explanation of the impact of price ceilings would have on the field of medicine in the United Sta
melisa1 [442]

Answer: Price ceilings are beneficial to society, and are often necessary, in that they make sure that essential goods are financially accessible to the average person, at least in the short run. By lowering costs, price ceilings also have the beneficial effect of helping to stimulate demand, which can contribute to the health of an economy.

However, there can also be downsides to price ceilings. While they stimulate demand, price ceilings can also cause shortages. Where the ceiling is set, there is more demand than at the equilibrium price. This means that the amount of the good or service supplied is less than the quantity demanded.

For example: in agriculture, medicine, and education, many governments set maximum prices to make the needed goods or services more affordable. Producers may respond to such an economic situation by rationing supplies, decreasing production levels or lowering the quality of production, making the consumer pay extra for otherwise free elements of the good (features, options, etc.), and more.

Request: Can I please get brainliest

8 0
2 years ago
Your friend is having trouble saving money. How can you teach them the “pay-yourself-first principle”? Do you think this is an i
BigorU [14]
I think this is important without a doubt . You might need to use that money someday for yourself but won't have it because you spent it on a HUGE list of groceries. If you put some money aside for yourself, you will have money that your allowed to do anything with (saving, buying clothes, buying cars, etc.) You should always save some of your payment that way you always have extra money in case of any money emergenies or such. 
4 0
3 years ago
Sally is planning to sell her company and she prefers to obtain immediate liquidity, and the value of consideration to be fixed.
ella [17]

Answer: A cash sale

                                           

Explanation: In simple words, liquidity refers to the ability of an organisation to bear its short term expenses. For that a company must have cash or some assets that can be readily converted into cash in case of need.

Hence Sally should sell her company in cash sale as it will result in inflow of cash which will create liquidity and also the consideration will be certain with short timely payments.

Other option such as IPO or  stock for stock might result in increase in value but certainly won't give her liquidity.  

6 0
3 years ago
The product structure overcomes one of the challenges common to a functional organization structure because it is
Alona [7]

Answer:

focus on the goods being made

7 0
1 year ago
Consider a call option on an asset with an exercise price of $100, a put option on that same asset with an exercise price of $10
zubka84 [21]

Answer: The values are missing below are the values

a. $105

b. $95

answer :

a) $5

b) -$5 ( loss )  

Explanation:

From the perspective of the long position for each of the two options  upon expiration

a) For $105

for the long position ( long call ) since the expired price > than the exercise price

i.e. $105 > $100 the profit = $105 - $100 = $5

b) For $95

For the long position ( long call ) since the expired price < than the exercise price

i.e. $95 < $100 the profit = $95 - $100 =  - $5  ( a loss is incurred )

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • "The first generation Apple iPod was introduced in 2001 and sold for $500. The following year a mini version was introduced for
    13·1 answer
  • Vega corporation expects to pay a 4​% bonus on net income after deducting the bonus. assume the corporation reports net income o
    9·1 answer
  • Your total cash income is $80,000. You pay $8,000 in taxes and $60,000 in other expenses. Your savings ratio is
    11·1 answer
  • Harrington makes all sales on account, subject to the following collection pattern: 30% are collected in the month of sale; 60%
    7·1 answer
  • On March 15, 20X7, Barrel Company paid property taxes of $120,000 on its factory building for calendar year 20X7. On July 1, 20X
    8·1 answer
  • Rivoli Inc. hired you as a consultant to help estimate its cost of capital. You have been provided with the following data: D0 =
    15·1 answer
  • A corporation was incorporated on January 1, Year 6, with $500,000 from the issuance of stock and borrowed funds of $75,000. Dur
    12·1 answer
  • Christine manages a car wash. The owner of the car wash thinks they could be making bigger profits. Christine looks for ways to
    13·1 answer
  • The demand curve of a monopolistically competitive producer is Multiple Choice less elastic than that of either a pure monopolis
    9·1 answer
  • The majority of the public would consider it unethical to increase executive salaries significantly while minimum wage employees
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!