1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jeka94
4 years ago
12

One part of a freely swinging magnet always points

Physics
2 answers:
Sladkaya [172]4 years ago
8 0
One part of a freely swinging magnet always points to the Earth's magnetic pole in the Northern Hemisphere.
Readme [11.4K]4 years ago
3 0

Answer: The correct answer is (d).

Explanation:

Magnet has two poles: South pole and North pole. The same poles of the magnets repel each other. The opposite poles of the magnets attract each other.

In the absence of other magnet, a freely swinging magnet points in North-South direction. The earth has a magnetic field. The magnetic field of the bar magnet is same as the magnetic field of the earth's magnet.

The position of  the earth's magnetic poles are not fixed. The south pole of the earth's magnet lies in the geographic north as it attracts the north pole of the freely swinging magnet.

If one part of a freely suspended magnet always points to Earth's magnetic pole in the Northern Hemisphere.

You might be interested in
Please answer correctly<br>will give the brainliest<br>Urgent​
EastWind [94]

Answer:

f (frequency) = V / y   where V is the speed of sound and y the wavelength

f = 1500 m/s / 1.5 m = 1000 / sec

T (period) = 1 / f = .001 sec

Suppose you replace the horn by a drum then the period would be the time between the beats of the drum - now if the source is moving towards the observer then the distance between crests  of the wave produced by the drum will be shortened by V * T because of the motion of the drum "towards" the observer, and since the wavelength is shorter the frequency heard by the observer will be higher, and the higher the speed of of the car the shorter the wavelength as seen by the observer and the higher the frequency.

Also, if the car is moving away from the observer then the distance between the crests of the wave emitted will be further apart, and the observer will hear a lower frequency.

3 0
3 years ago
Do you think that solids can undergo convection
Alex_Xolod [135]
<span>Convection means the movement happens inside a fluid by the cause of too much heat and lesser density to rise, and also the colder cause denser materials to sink.
Thus, Solid cannot undergo convection because the molecules inside the solid are closer and can hardly move unlike liquid.
So, when the temperature got hotter or colder, the molecules on solid will only vibrate and not convert.
Therefore, this concludes that the solid do not undergo convection rather conduction of heat.</span>



7 0
4 years ago
A driver who does not wear a seat belt continues to move at the initial velocity until she or he hits something solid (e.g the s
egoroff_w [7]

This question is incomplete, the complete question is;

Seatbelts provide two main advantages in a car accident (1) they keep you from being thrown from the car and (2) they reduce the force that acts on your during the collision to survivable levels. This second benefit can be illustrated by comparing the net force encountered by a driver in a head-on collision with and without a seat beat.  

1) A driver wearing a seat beat decelerates at roughly the same rate as the car it self. Since many modern cars have a "crumble zone" built into the front of the car, let us assume that the car decelerates of a distance of 1.1 m. What is the net force acting on a 70 kg driver who is driving at 18 m/sec and comes to rest in this distance?

Fwith belt =

2) A driver who does not wear a seat belt continues to move at the initial velocity until she or he hits something solid (e.g the steering wheel) and then comes to rest in a very short distance. Find the net force on a driver without seat belts who comes to rest in 1.1 cm.

Fwithout belt =

Answer:

1) The Net force on the driver with seat belt is 10.3 KN

2) the Net force on the driver without seat belts who comes to rest in 1.1 cm is 1030.9 KN

Explanation:

Given the data in the question;

from the equation of motion, v² = u² + 2as

we solve for a

a = (v² - u²)/2s ----- let this be equation 1

we know that, F = ma ------- let this be equation 2

so from equation 1 and 2

F = m( (v² - u²)/2s )

where m is mass, a is acceleration, u is initial velocity, v is final velocity and s is the displacement.

1)

Wearing sit belt, car decelerates of a distance of 1.1 m. What is the net force acting on a 70 kg driver who is driving at 18 m/sec and comes to rest in this distance.

i.e, m = 70 kg, u = 18 m/s, v = 0 { since it came to rest }, s = 1.1 m

so we substitute the given values into the equation;

F = 70( ((0)² - (18)²) / 2 × 1.1 )

F = 70 × ( -324 / 2.4 )

F = 70 × -147.2727

F = -10309.09 N

F = -10.3 KN

The negative sign indicates that the direction of the force is opposite compared to the direction of the motion.

Fwith belt =  10.3 KN

Therefore, Net force of the driver is 10.3 KN

2)

No sit belt,  

m = 70 kg, u = 18 m/s, v = 0 { since it came to rest }, s = 1.1 cm = 1.1 × 10⁻² m

we substitute

F = 70( ((0)² - (18)²) / 2 × 1.1 × 10⁻² )

F = 70 × ( -324 / 0.022 )

F = 70 × -14727.2727

F = -1030909.08 N

F = -1030.9 KN

The negative sign indicates that the direction of the force is opposite compared to the direction of the motion.

Fwithout belt = 1030.9 KN

Therefore, the net force on the driver without seat belts who comes to rest in 1.1 cm is 1030.9 KN

4 0
3 years ago
An object is projected at 25m/s from the top of a building of height 50m. At the same instant,another object is projected from t
docker41 [41]

A) The objects have the same vertical position after 2 seconds

B) The objects have same vertical position at y = 30.4 m (but they do not collide since they have different x-position)

Explanation:

The motion of the first object along the vertical direction is a uniformly accelerated motion, so we can write its position at time t using the following equation:

y_1(t)=h+u_1 t + \frac{1}{2}gt^2

where:

h = 50 m is the initial height

u_1=0 is the initial vertical velocity (the object is projected horizontally, so the vertical velocity is zero at the beginning)

g=-9.8 m/s^2 is the acceleration of gravity

So, its vertical position can be rewritten as

y_1(t)=50-4.9t^2

The position of object 2 instead can be written as

y_2(t)=(u_2 sin \theta)t + \frac{1}{2}gt^2

where

u_2 sin \theta is the initial vertical velocity, where

u_2 = 50 m/s is the initial velocity

\theta=30^{\circ} is the angle of projection

Substituting, we get:

y_2(t)=(50)(sin 30^{\circ})t+\frac{1}{2}(-9.8)t^2=25t-4.9t^2

The two objects collide when their vertical position is the same, so:

y_1(t)=y_2(t)\\50-4.9t^2 = 25t-4.9t^2

And solving for t, we find:

50=25t\\t= 2 s

Note that this means that the two object at t = 2 s have the  same vertical position: however, this is not true for the horizontal position.

B)

In order to find the point where they collide, we have to substitute the time of the collision that we found in part A into one of the expressions of the vertical position.

Substituting into the expression of object 2, we find:

y_2(t) = 25t-4.9t^2=25(2.0)-4.9(2.0)^2=30.4 m

We can verify that at the same time, the vertical position of object 1 is the same:

y_1(t)=50-4.9t^2=50-4.9(2.0)^2=30.4 m

This means that the two objects have the same vertical position at 30.4 m.

However, in reality, the two objects do not collide. In fact, object 1 is moving in the horizontal direction with constant velocity

v_{1x}=25 m/s

So its horizontal position at t = 2.0 s is

x_1(2.0)=v_{1x}t=(25)(2.0)=50 m

While object 2 is moving in the horizontal plane with velocity

v_{2x}=u_2 cos \theta=(50)(cos 30^{\circ})=43.3 m/s

So its horizontal position  at t = 2.0 s is

x_2(2.0)=v_{2x}t=(43.3)(2.0)=86.6 m

So in reality, the two objects do not collide, if they start from the same x-position.

Learn more about projectile motion:

brainly.com/question/8751410

#LearnwithBrainly

7 0
3 years ago
A 2000 kg truck is traveling at 25 m/s. Determine the impulse needed
Vitek1552 [10]

Answer:

A 7kg impulse

Explanation:

i think sorry if not

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If it takes a ball dropped from rest 2.069 s to fall to the ground, from what height h was it released?
    5·1 answer
  • a student sees a newspaper ad for an apartment that has 1330 square foot of floor space. how many square meters of area are ther
    12·1 answer
  • 11) Arthur and Betty start walking toward each other when they are 100 m apart. Arthur has a speed of 3.0 m/s and Betty has a sp
    14·1 answer
  • An object is 6.0 cm in front of a converging lens with a focal length of 10 cm.Use ray tracing to determine the location of the
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not an example of approximate simple harmonic motion? A. a ball bouncing on the floor
    5·1 answer
  • Consider the model above. It represents the electrical force. As r increases, the attractive force decreases. How would this mod
    6·2 answers
  • According to the law of reflection, the angle of incidence is equal to the angle of
    14·2 answers
  • What is the main action and reaction forces at work when a person leans against a car? * 3 points A. The person pushes against t
    10·1 answer
  • What was one reason that immigrant came to America in the late 1800
    13·2 answers
  • A seismic wave travels from rock into sea water. In rock, the wave has a speed of 3,950 m/s and a wavelength of 560m. In seawate
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!