Answer:
(a)2(89x+84)
(b)
Step-by-step explanation:
The dimensions of the larger rectangular field are:
- Length=5x + 12; Width
= 9x + 14.
The dimensions of the smaller rectangular soccer field are:
(a)Area of the part of the field that is outside the soccer field
=Area of the larger rectangular field - Area of the Soccer Field
=(5x+12)(9x+14)-5x(9x)
=(5x)(9x)+70x+108x+168-5x(9x)
=178x+168
=2(89x+84)
(b)Radius of the Semicircular Fountain =2x
From Part (a),
Area of the larger rectangular field - Area of the Soccer Field=178x+168
Area of the Semicircular Fountain =
Area of the Field that does not include the soccer field or the fountain.
=Area of the larger rectangular field - Area of the Soccer Field-Area of the Semicircular Fountain
<span>2 + 15a - 2
= 15a (because 2 - 2 = 0)
hope it helps</span>
Answer:
Hello! answer: 180
Step-by-step explanation:
what I did to find answer is cut them into pieces I cut the m into 3 pieces and now just have to multiply my base x height so for the left one I did 12 x 6 = 72 for the middle I did 6 x 6 = 36 and for the right one I did 12 x 6 = 72 I add these up so...
72 + 36 + 72 = 180 so the surface area is 180! I hope this helps!
Answer:
-0.9
Step-by-step explanation:
-0.9 × 100 = -90
Answer: There is not a good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old because the prediction given by the trend line produced by the regression calculator probably is not valid that far in the future.
Step-by-step explanation:
Years since tree was planted (x) - - - - height (y)
2 - - - - 17
3 - - - - 25
5 - - - 42
6 - - - - 47
7 - - - 54
9 - - - 69
Using a regression calculator :
The height of tree can be modeled by the equation : ŷ = 7.36X + 3.08
With y being the predicted variable; 7.36 being the slope and 3.08 as the intercept.
X is the independent variable which is used in calculating the value of y.
Predicted height when years since tree was planted(x) = 100
ŷ = 7.36X + 3.08
ŷ = 7.36(100) + 3.08
y = 736 + 3.08
y = 739.08
Forward prediction of 100 years produced by the trendline would probably give an invalid value because the trendline only models a range of 9 years prediction. However, a linear regression equation isn't the best for making prediction that far in into the future.
