1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sveticcg [70]
3 years ago
14

A quarterback back pedals 3.3 meters southward and then runs 5.7 meters northward. For this motion, what is the distance moved?

What is the magnitude and direction of the displacement?
Physics
1 answer:
mixas84 [53]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The distance moved is 9 meters

The magnitude of the displacement is 2.4 meters

The direction of the displacement is northward

Explanation:

- <em><u>Distance</u></em> is the length of the actual path between the initial and the

  final position. Distance is a scalar quantity

- <u><em>Displacement</em></u> is the change in position, measuring from its starting

  position to the final position. Displacement is a vector quantity

The quarterback pedals 3.3 meters southward

That means it moves down 3.3 meters

Then runs 5.7 meters northward

That means it runs up 5.7 meters

The distance = 3.3 + 5.7 = 9 meters

<em></em>

<em>The distance moved is 9 meters</em>

It moves southward (down) for 3.3 meters and then moves northward

(up) for 5.7

It moves from zero to 3.3 down and then moves up to 5.7

The displacement = 5.7 - 3.3 = 2.4 meters northward

<em />

<em>The magnitude of the displacement is 2.4 meters</em>

<em>The direction of the displacement is northward</em>

You might be interested in
Whats 6 3/7 ×1 5/9.
aniked [119]
6 3/7 * 1 5/9
45/7 * 14/9
630/63
10
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLS HELP QUICK!!!!!!!!
vazorg [7]
Position 1 I believe because that is when the potential energy is released on the downfall
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A baseball player throws a ball horizontally at the same moment another baseball player jobs a second ball straight down from th
attashe74 [19]

I don't know what you mean when you say he "jobs" the other ball, and the answer to this question really depends on that word.

I'm going to say that the second player is holding the second ball, and he just opens his fingers and lets the ball <u><em>drop</em></u>, at the same time and from the same height as the first ball.

Now I'll go ahead and answer the question that I've just invented:

Strange as it may seem, <em>both</em> balls hit the ground at the <em>same time</em> ... the one that's thrown AND the one that's dropped.  The horizontal speed of the thrown ball has no effect on its vertical acceleration, so both balls experience the same vertical behavior.

And here's another example of the exact same thing:

Say you shoot a bullet straight out of a horizontal rifle barrel, AND somebody else <em>drops</em> another bullet at exactly the same time, from a point right next to the end of the rifle barrel.  I know this is hard to believe, but both of those bullets hit the ground at the same time too, just like the baseballs ... the bullet that's shot out of the rifle and the one that's dropped from the end of the barrel.

7 0
3 years ago
How would the seasons change if the earth were tilted at 90 degrees instead of 23.5?
PIT_PIT [208]
<span>The 23.5 degree tilt is responsible for the seasons. If the earth had no tilt there would not be seasons. If the earth was tilted by 90 degrees the seasonal changes would be at the most extreme. The Earth's pole would point directly at the sun at a point on the track around the sun. As the Earth revolves around the Sun the pole would alternate twice each year between pointing directly at the sun and being perpendicular to the sun. 

I hope this helps you! 
xo, Leafling</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Wave-particle duality tells us that wave and particle models apply to all objects whatever the size, so why don't we observe wav
Genrish500 [490]

Answer:

Because the wavelengths of macroscopic objects are too short for them to be detectable.

Explanation:

Wavelength of an object is given by de Broglie wavelength as:

\lambda=\frac{h}{mv}

Where, 'h' is Planck's constant, 'm' is mass of object and 'v' is its velocity.

So, for macroscopic objects, the mass is very large compared to microscopic objects. As we can observe from the above formula, there is an inverse relationship between the mass and wavelength of the object.

So, for vary larger masses, the wavelength would be too short and one will find it undetectable. Therefore, we don't observe wave properties in macroscopic objects.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A graph of Boyle’s law shows the relationship between
    11·1 answer
  • A lion has a mass of 45 kg. Answer the following questions about it, using correct units. a. The lion runs at a speed of 14.2 m/
    14·1 answer
  • A homing pigeon starts from rest and accelerates uniformly at +4.00 m/s squared for 10.0 seconds. What is its velocity after the
    13·1 answer
  • 1. Applying _____ indicates that layers were repositioned from a flat-lying orientation.
    15·1 answer
  • How tall in cm is 5.4 feet
    15·1 answer
  • A passenger on a stopped bus notices that rain is falling vertically just outside the window. When the bus moves with constant v
    14·1 answer
  • A stereo speaker produces a pure \"E\" tone, with a frequency of 329.6 Hz. What is the period of the sound wave produced by the
    7·1 answer
  • Help me pls 13 points
    9·1 answer
  • Hello, how to do qn 5?:)l
    11·1 answer
  • Over time Pangaea broke apart to form other continents.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!