from the question you can see that some detail is missing, using search engines i was able to get a similar question on "https://www.slader.com/discussion/question/a-student-throws-a-water-balloon-vertically-downward-from-the-top-of-a-building-the-balloon-leaves-t/"
here is the question : A student throws a water balloon vertically downward from the top of a building. The balloon leaves the thrower's hand with a speed of 60.0m/s. Air resistance may be ignored,so the water balloon is in free fall after it leaves the throwers hand. a) What is its speed after falling for 2.00s? b) How far does it fall in 2.00s? c) What is the magnitude of its velocity after falling 10.0m?
Answer:
(A) 26 m/s
(B) 32.4 m
(C) v = 15.4 m/s
Explanation:
initial speed (u) = 6.4 m/s
acceleration due to gravity (a) = 9.9 m/s^[2}
time (t) = 2 s
(A) What is its speed after falling for 2.00s?
from the equation of motion v = u + at we can get the speed
v = 6.4 + (9.8 x 2) = 26 m/s
(B) How far does it fall in 2.00s?
from the equation of motion
we can get the distance covered
s = (6.4 x 2) + (0.5 x 9.8 x 2 x 2)
s = 12.8 + 19.6 = 32.4 m
c) What is the magnitude of its velocity after falling 10.0m?
from the equation of motion below we can get the velocity

v = 15.4 m/s
Explanation:
In vector geometry, the resultant vector is defined as: “A resultant vector is a combination or, in simpler words, can be defined as the sum of two or more vectors which has its own magnitude and direction.”
I hope it's helpful!
Answer:
2.7067 eV
Explanation:
h = Planck's constant = 
c = Speed of light = 
= Threshold wavelength = 459 nm
Work function is given by

Converting to eV


The work function W0 of this metal is 2.7067 eV
Answer:
b. v = 0, a = 9.8 m/s² down.
Explanation:
Hi there!
The acceleration of gravity is always directed to the ground (down) and, near the surface of the earth, has a constant value of 9.8 m/s². Since the answer "b" is the only option with an acceleration of 9.8 m/s² directed downwards, that would solve the exercise. But why is the velocity zero at the highest point?
Let´s take a look at the height function:
h(t) = h0 + v0 · t + 1/2 g · t²
Where
h0 = initial height
v0 = initial velocity
t = time
g = acceleration due to gravity
Notice that the function is a negative parabola if we consider downward as negative (in that case "g" would be negative). Then, the function has a maximum (the highest point) at the vertex of the parabola. At the maximum point, the slope of the tangent line to the function is zero, because the tangent line is horizontal at a maximum point. The slope of the tangent line to the function is the rate of change of height with respect to time, i.e, the velocity. Then, the velocity is zero at the maximum height.
Another way to see it (without calculus):
When the ball is going up, the velocity vector points up and the velocity is positive. After reaching the maximum height, the velocity vector points down and is negative (the ball starts to fall). At the maximum height, the velocity vector changed its direction from positive to negative, then at that point, the velocity vector has to be zero.
Answer:
Im not sure who you are talking about, but if you are talking about Dominic Raab, well, he failed to make a crucial phone call to seek urgent help airlifting translators out of Afghanistan. if you are not talking about this Dominic, then please add more information to your question.