Answer:
B. Dr. O'Malley is obtaining informed consent from his participants. Dr. Quick is debriefing her participants.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Dr. O'Malley is obtaining informed consent from his participants. Dr. Quick is debriefing her participants. That is because by telling the participants that the experiment is voluntary and that they can stop at any time, then by continuing to partake in the experiment the participants are providing informed consent. Dr. Quick on the other hand is talking to the participants about the experiment that they have just undergone and what happened, thus debriefing them.
Answer:
C. A Catholic woman who fasts on Good Friday to honor religious custom.
Explanation:
Today, many people carefully consider what they eat before consuming it according to his or her values, in contrast to choosing what to eat only by cravings or 'superficial' decisions. For example, choosing to consume less meat due to the impacts that the meat industry has in our climate is a decision someone makes in regard to values, not only nutrition. So, there is much more analysis involved in this type of decisions.
In this scenario, a Catholic woman decides to fast on Good Friday because she is honoring her religion. This is not a nutrition or health choice, this is a conscious decision based on her values. On the other hand, the other options refer to decisions they make in regard to taste, cravings, or diet.
A spouse can be provided information such as hospital admission dates as long as they have the following validating information:
This is because according to HIPAA, a patient's health information is considered private. Hence, before a patient's information is given to anyone, such as a spouse or family member, the spouse or family member must provide validating information such as Social security number, and Marriage Contract to prove they are family members.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is Option A and B.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/1645824
Answer:
frustration-aggression principle.
Explanation:
According to the frustration-aggression principle, frustration is responsible for creating anger and this anger leads to aggressive behavior. Frustration occurs when you are blocked by someone to achieve your particular goal and this frustration triggers aggression.
So will is frustrated after learning that he is not selected in the team which leads to aggression in him due to which he vandalized the team's locker room and broke several of the school's windows. So here his aggressive behavior can be best explained by the frustration-aggression principle.
Answer: A. To report PHI to a law enforcement official reasonably
able to prevent or lessen a serious and imminent threat
to the health or safety of an individual or the public.
• To report PHI that the covered entity in good faith
believes to be evidence of a crime that occurred on the
premises of the covered entity.
• To alert law enforcement to the death of the individual,
when there is a suspicion that death resulted from
criminal conduct.
• When responding to an off-site medical emergency, as
necessary to alert law enforcement to criminal activity.
• To report PHI to law enforcement when required by law
to do so (such as reporting gunshots or stab wounds).
Explanation:
