When you evaluate the function f (x) = 4 • 7 ^ x for x = -1 you get:
f (-1) = 4 * 7 ^ -1
f(-1) = 4* 1/7
f (-1) = 0.5714
The next part of the question is not clear. If it refers to the function at x = 2 then:
f (2) = 4 * 7 ^ (2)
f(2) =4*49
f (2) = 196
If it refers to it in x ^ 2
f (x ^ 2) = 4 * 7 ^ (x ^ 2)
18?
-18 divided by [-1/6]
is 18
hopefully that's what you were looking for.?!!
Answer:
$15 < $4n + $5
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that Billy needs to make more than $15 between his allowance and the lawns that he mows. This means our inequality should include $15<. Also, since Billy will make $4 per lawn, that means we need to multiply $4 by the number of lawns he needs to mow, n: $4n. So far we have the following: $15<$4n. Next, we know that he makes $5 each week, on top of what he makes mowing each law. This means we need to add the $5 to the $4n. When we put all of these pieces together, we will get the following inequality: $15<$4n+$5
Answer:
Common Ratio = 2
Step-by-step explanation:
Emily started with 12 lb at start.
She will double each day
So,
2nd day she will take up weight = 12 * 2 = 24
3rd day she will take up weight = 24 * 2 = 48
and so on
This is a geometric sequence, which is a sequence where each term is found by multiplying the previous term by a constant which is known as the common ratio.
Here, we are multiplying by "2" to get the next term, so we an say the common ratio is "2".
<u>Answer: Common Ratio = 2</u>
Answer:
D. Because we would be interested in any difference between running on hard and soft surfaces, we should use a two-sided hypothesis test
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
When planning what kind of hypothesis to use, you have to take into account any other studies that were made about that topic so that you can decide the orientation you will give them.
Normally, when there is no other information available to give an orientation to your experiment, the first step to take is to make a two-tailed test, for example, μ₁=μ₂ vs. μ₁≠μ₂, this way you can test whether there is any difference between the two stands. Only after having experimental evidence that there is any difference between the treatments is there any sense into testing which one is better than the other.
I hope you have a SUPER day!
