Answer:
The moment of inertia of the system decreases and the angular speed increases.
Explanation:
This very concept might not seem to be interesting at first, but in combination with the law of the conservation of angular momentum, it can be used to describe many fascinating physical phenomena and predict motion in a wide range of situations.
In other words, the moment of inertia for an object describes its resistance to angular acceleration, accounting for the distribution of mass around its axis of rotation.
Therefore, in the course of this action, it is said that the moment of inertia of the system decreases and the angular speed increases.
If Equal distance is traveled in equal interval of time then it is known as uniform motion in which velocity of object will remain same.
Then if distance covered will be same and the time taken to cover same distance is decreasing then it shows that speed is increasing with time due to which it took less time to cover same distance. This is also known as positive acceleration.
Now if the distance covered will be same and time taken to cover same distance is increasing then it shows that speed is decreasing with time due to which it took more time to cover the same distance. This is also known as negative acceleration.
Now in the above case it is given that the first mile takes you 10 minutes. The second mile takes you 20 minutes. So the time taken is increasing while we cover same distance so this is an example of <u>Negative Acceleration</u>
Answer:
The boat's acceleration is 4 m/s²
Explanation:
This question seeks to test the knowledge of acceleration and how to calculate acceleration when the speed is provided. Hence, the formula for acceleration would be used here.
Acceleration (m/s²) = speed (in m/s) ÷ time (in seconds)
Acceleration = 80 m/s ÷ 20 secs
Acceleration = 4 m/s² or 4 ms⁻²
The boat's acceleration is 4 m/s²
Almost all telescopes have a circular mirror. The area of a circle is proportional to
where
is the radius of the circle, the constant of proportionality being
Therefore the area of 150 meter telescope would be
times bigger than the area of the smaller (10 meter) telescope.
