The missing part of the incomplete question is given below:
Which important step of scientific design is Shameka conducting?
repetition
replication
verification of results
using controlled variables
Answer:
Verification of results
Explanation:
The way toward gathering five examples of water from various sources is conveyed to confirm the outcome. By gathering water from five distinct areas of a similar source the analyst can genuinely find out the nature of the water in her region of remain.
On the off chance that after examples are tried it is found the water isn't sound, the outcomes would be acknowledged as it has been appropriately checked and a proper move would be made.
Thus, the correct answer is - verification of results
الملك - الإتاوات - المحاكم - المجلس الملكي - القانون الروماني
Answer:
b) Nothing will happen, the sea saw will still be balanced.
Explanation:
b) Nothing will happen, the sea saw will still be balanced.
Reason:-
When two kids are balanced, the sum of torques on the seesaw will be zero.
if each kid, reduces their distances by half, then the torque of each kid will be half and the sum of torque of each on the seesaw will be zero.
Therefore the seesaw is balanced
Answer:She would need to first know the weight of the sculpture and what she is going to move it with then she will need to use newton's second law to calculate the amount of force needed to move it
Explanation: I just did the assignment on edgunity
It's not so much a "contradiction" as an approximation. Newton's law of gravitation is an inverse square law whose range is large. It keeps people on the ground, and it keeps satellites in orbit and that's some thousands of km. The force on someone on the ground - their weight - is probably a lot larger than the centripetal force keeping a satellite in orbit (though I've not actually done a calculation to totally verify this). The distance a falling body - a coin, say - travels is very small, and over such a small distance gravity is assumed/approximated to be constant.
