Answer:
nature; Nature versus Nurture controversy
Explanation:
Nature versus nurture controversy / debate involves extent to which the particular aspects of the behavior are the product of either inherited or acquired influences.
-
Nature is pre-wiring and nature is influenced by the genetic inheritance and also other biological factors. While, nurture is taken generally as influence of the external factors after the conception.
-
Nature-nurture controversy is concerned with relative contribution which both influences make to the human behavior.
<u>Thus, having red eyes is a factor of nature and such case study is described in the Nature versus Nurture controversy.</u>
Answer:
uber eats and postmates
Explanation:
the reason i think both are doing great is because this pandemic is making people lose there jobs so job like these are coming in handy and also because for those who dont have a car or had a car but cant pay it off do to this pandemic you can use a bike to pick up n deliver
Answer: client's competency to stand trial.
Explanation: The client's competency refers to the client's state of mind during the criminal proceedings. In order to be competent to stand trial, the client must be able to understand the legal proceedings they are facing and the technicalities. Also, part of the competence is linked to the client's ability to work with the attorney and assist in their own defense. The competence statutes is paramount because it protects people's rights - it's not ethical for a person who can't understand the proceedings go before a judge and enter a plea of any kind.
The correct answer is an evocative gene-environment correlation.
An evocative gene-environment correlation refers to the phenomenon where the behavior that an individual has inherited elicits or leads to an environmental response. In this instance, Vernon's (inherited) temperament is active and friendly due to which his parents provide him with social stimulation. On the other hand, Vivian, who has a more passive and quiet nature (inherited) receives less stimulation from her parents.
The answer is: An experiment is proposed on the relationship between gender-related stereotypes in math and the subsequent performance by males and females on math tests.
Here the requirement for research with human subjects according to the Fed :
<em>"Obtains information or biospecimens through intervention or interaction with the individual, and uses, studies, or analyzes the information or biospecimens; or Obtains, uses, studies, analyzes, or generates identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens."</em>
The experiment on the second option fulfill the criteria because:
- The experiment should use studies or analytics to obtain some sort of private information from the subjects. (<u>such as test scores and subjects' anxiety level)</u>
- The experiment should make some sort of intervention that can be used to measure its hypothesis. (<u>the test above could divide the subjects into two groups. First group of female subjects could be make to take the test without the presence of male subjects while the second group do the test with the presence of male subjects)</u>
- The researchers need to interact with the subject in a certain way.
<u>(meaning that the subjects can't be anonymous to the researchers</u>)
