Answer:
6.5
Step-by-step explanation:
-8.1
Step-by-step explanation:

<em>Times </em><em>all </em><em>by </em><em>9</em><em> </em><em>to </em><em>get </em><em>rid </em><em>of </em><em>fraction</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Take </em><em>2</em><em>1</em><em>.</em><em>6</em><em> </em><em>away</em><em> </em><em>from</em><em> </em><em>both</em><em> </em><em>sides</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Divide</em><em> </em><em>by </em><em>-</em><em>4</em>
<em>
</em>
They both represent the expression, because when simplified the expression equals 8x+4, but you could also write it like 2(3x+2)+2x
Well, if we see the graph of x^2
the vertex is (0,0)
if we reflect it acrosss the x axis, teh vertex is still (0,0)
verteical strech doesn't change the vertex
vertex of g(x) is same as f(x)
first answer