Answer:
-68
Step-by-step explanation:
-28 + - 40 =
2 + 4 = 6
8 + 0 = 8 making
-68
hope this helped
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
x + 7) x³ + 7x²- 2x + 6 ( x²- 2
<u> x³ + 7x²</u>
-2x + 6
<u>-2x - 14</u>
+20
Therefore, we can write the expression in the remainder quotient form as,

Answer:
114
Step-by-step explanation:
\+_+/
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the heights and pulse rates of women
Step-by-step explanation:
The correlation coefficient between the variables h(height in inches) and pulse rates (in beats per minute) is 0.202
Sample size n=40
Level of significane alpha = 0.01
Create null and alternate hypothesis as:
H0: r=0
Ha: r not equal 0
(Two tailed test at 1% significance level)
Sample r = 0.202
r difference = 0.202
test statistic t = 
df =n-2 =38
t critical value for 0.01 and df =38 is 2.704
Since our test statistic lies below 2.704, we accept null hypothesis
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the heights and pulse rates of women