Answer:
A. Deduction
Explanation:
Deduction or deductive reasoning is the process whereby a logical conclusion is reached from one or more statements. Deductive reasoning involves using generalization or a general fact to reach a specific and logical conclusion. In the case, the general fact is that all HR manager in the firm has advanced degree. The logical conclusion here is that since Chloe is a HR manager with the most experience, then surely she must have an advanced degree.
In summary, deductive reasoning moves from generalities to a specific streamlined logical conclusion.
Answer:
It will take 10 years and 197 days.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
You invest $180 in a mutual fund today that pays 6.80 percent interest annually.
To calculate the time required to double the money, we need to use the following formula:
n=[ln(FV/PV)]/ln(1+r)
n= [ln(360/180)] / ln(1.068)
n= 10.54
To be more accurate:
0.54*365= 197
It will take 10 years and 197 days.
Answer:
E. all of the above are examples of this adaptation.
Explanation:
Based on the information and answers provided it can be said that all of the above are examples of this adaptation. All of these cut backs were done in order to save money for more important aspects within the police policies and practices. While expanded use of technology systems and joint forces with other county governments were done in order to facilitate the jobs and cut down on time needed for certain practices which in term saved money.
Answer:
E. b and c is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
Negotiation is a technique of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) which retains power to decide the disagreement to the parties included.
Explanation:
Inequality or unequal bargaining power take place when the provisions/terms of a contract are unjust, unreasonable, and unfair. Negotiation between 2 parties with unequal bargaining power can lead to the stronger party being oppressive at the time of negotiation with the other party having weaker bargaining power which results in unfair consequences for the weaker party.
To ensure such unfairness does not take place to the weaker party, the alternate remedy is approaching the law. The law does not consent the noticeably unfair use by the stronger party of its advantage in the bargaining power, and would intervene by modifying or setting aside the contract to reinstate equity in negotiation between the parties.
