Answer:
22%
Explanation:
Net income = Annual cash flow - Depreciation
Net income = 24350 - (80,000-5,000 / 5)
Net income = 24350 - 15,000
Net income = $9350
Average investment = Beg. value + End. Value / 2
Average investment = 80,000 + 5,000 / 2
Average investment = $42,500
Annual rate of return = Net income / Average investment * 100
Annual rate of return = $9350 / $42,500 * 100
Annual rate of return = 0.22 * 100
Annual rate of return = 22%
Answer:
a. $181.17
b. $218.82
c. $319.21
Explanation:
If the borrower repays the loan after 2 year
PV = $150
n = 2
r = 9.9%
P/yr = 1
Pmt = $0
FV = ?
Using a financial calculator, FV = $181.1702
The amount that will be due if the borrower repays the loan after 2 year is $181.17.
If the borrower repays the loan after 4 years
PV = $150
n = 4
r = 9.9%
P/yr = 1
Pmt = $0
FV = ?
Using a financial calculator, FV = $218.8175
The amount that will be due if the borrower repays the loan after 2 year is $218.82.
If the borrower repays the loan after 8 years
PV = $150
n = 8
r = 9.9%
P/yr = 1
Pmt = $0
FV = ?
Using a financial calculator, FV = $319.2073
The amount that will be due if the borrower repays the loan after 2 year is $319.21.
Answer:
$378,756
Explanation;
The net present value of land will be =$450,000/1.09^2=$378,756
The land will be recorded in net present value of land by discounting the cost of land with interest rate of buying from the bank.
Answer: 28.6%
Explanation:
The return on the total asset of a firm will be calculated as the net income divided by the total asset and this will be:
=Net income / Total assets
=50,000/175,000
=28.6%
Therefore, return on total asset is 28.6%
Answer:
The answer is: D) Fire the player. The team may suffer financially at first, but if the public has faith in the organization, the team and the league will benefit in the long run. If the owner keeps the tape a secret and the public finds out about his actions, the team - and society - will suffer harm from the loss of public trust.
Explanation:
Akers firmly believed that ethics were fundamental to economic competitiveness. He argued that without ethical behavior, individuals, corporations and society as a whole couldn´t be economically competitive.
So in this case, he would have simply terminated the player´s contract without regarding any of the potential downsides for the team.
