Answer:
b) the reaction proceeds to a new equilibrium in the direction that offsets the change.
Explanation:
According to Le Chatelier's principle, when a system experiences a constraint such as a change in pressure, temperature or concentration, the system will readjust itself in order to annul the constraint.
This simply means that when temperature, concentration or pressure is changed, a new equilibrium position is reached in order to offset the changes in the system.
Inertia. Inertia is the natural tendency of bodies to remain in their states of either rectilinear or resting motion.
Answer:
2.1 kg of water
Explanation:
Step 1: Given data
- Moles of lithium bromide (solute): 4.3 moles
- Molality of the solution (m): 2.05 m (2.05 mol/kg)
- Mass of water (solvent): ?
Step 2: Calculate the mass of water required
Molality is equal to the moles of solute divided by the kilograms of solvent.
m = moles of solute/kilograms of solvent
kilograms of solvent = moles of solute/m
kilograms of solvent = 4.3 mol /(2.05 mol/kg) = 2.1 kg
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Step 1 occurs at a slower rate than Step 2.
Answer:
(a) 7.11 x 10⁻³⁷ m
(b) 1.11 x 10⁻³⁵ m
Explanation:
(a) The de Broglie wavelength is given by the expression:
λ = h/p = h/mv
where h is plancks constant, p is momentum which is equal to mass times velocity.
We have all the data required to calculate the wavelength, but first we will have to convert the velocity to m/s, and the mass to kilograms to work in metric system.
v = 19.8 mi/h x ( 1609.34 m/s ) x ( 1 h / 3600 s ) = 8.85 m/s
m = 232 lb x ( 0.454 kg/ lb ) = 105.33 kg
λ = h/ mv = 6.626 x 10⁻³⁴ J·s / ( 105.33 kg x 8.85 m/s ) = 7.11 x 10⁻³⁷ m
(b) For this part we have to use the uncertainty principle associated with wave-matter:
ΔpΔx > = h/4π
mΔvΔx > = h/4π
Δx = h/ (4π m Δv )
Again to utilize this equation we will have to convert the uncertainty in velocity to m/s for unit consistency.
Δv = 0.1 mi/h x ( 1609.34 m/mi ) x ( 1 h/ 3600 s )
= 0.045 m/s
Δx = h/ (4π m Δv ) = 6.626 x 10⁻³⁴ J·s / (4π x 105.33 kg x 0.045 m/s )
= 1.11 x 10⁻³⁵ m
This calculation shows us why we should not be talking of wavelengths associatiated with everyday macroscopic objects for we are obtaining an uncertainty of 1.11 x 10⁻³⁵ m for the position of the fullback.
