Answer:
Option A. Liable, because notice to Emmett is notice to Fridley.
Explanation:
The reason is that the principle is liable for the outcome of the Emmett actions in the principle's behalf. So it is clear that Fridley is liable. The agent have to work in the best interest of its principal which means that the failure to notify the additional tax liability to Fridley was part of agent's fiduciary duty. This means that the principle can sue its agent for the consequences of not placing the sufficient care to its principle.
The Fridley is also responsible because Emmett is acting as Fridley which means the notice to Emmett is actually notice to Fridley.
Answer:
Resources are limited in supply(scarcity) while wants are unlimited thus one has to make a choice to satisfy a need.Some choices are forgone(opportunity cost)
Answer:
Today, the Chinese own Armour and the famous Smithfield hams, together with the most quintessential American brand of all: Nathan's Famous hot dogs, with its iconic annual eating contest. ... It remains the largest total acquisition of a U.S. company by the Chinese.
Explanation:
Answer:
$67860
Explanation:
sell price of each toaster= $24.45
variable cost per unit= $16.65
total fixed cost= $25,700
number of unit sold x= 8700
the formula for contribution margin is
= sales price- variable cost
= (s-v)x
putting values we get
= 
= $67860
Hence the contribution margin the above case will be $67860
