1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
laila [671]
2 years ago
11

What economic system is characterized by an exchange of one product for another A.Currency B.Barter C.Loan D.Free market

Social Studies
2 answers:
Brut [27]2 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is B: BARTER

Bartering is the exchange of material goods or services for other objects or services, and differs from the usual sale in that it does not intermediate the money as a representative of the value in the transaction. The contract whereby two people access a barter is called a swap.

labwork [276]2 years ago
7 0

<u><em>The correct answer is option B. </em></u>

<u><em>Bartering occurs when two or more parties – such as individuals, businesses and nations – exchange goods or services  without the use of money.  An example of barter is salt provided in exchange for sugar. </em></u>

<u><em>Economists distinguish barter from gift economies in many ways; barter, for example, features immediate reciprocal exchange, not delayed in time. It usually takes place on a bilateral basis, but may be multilateral (i.e., mediated through a trade exchange). </em></u>

<u><em>In most developed countries, barter usually only exists parallel to monetary systems to a very limited extent. </em></u>

<u><em>According to the father of modern economics , Adam Smith, markets and economies pre-existed the state, and consequently should be free of government regulation. </em></u>

<u><em>He claimed that money was not the creation of governments. In his opinion, markets emerged out of the division of labour, by which individuals began to specialize in specific crafts and so had to depend on others for subsistence goods.  </em></u>

<u><em>These goods were first exchanged by barter. Specialization depended on trade, but was hindered by the "double coincidence of wants" which barter requires, i.e., for the exchange to occur, each participant must want what the other has. </em></u>

<u><em> </em></u>

<u><em> </em></u>


You might be interested in
Why did the United States negotiate treaties with the Plains Indians?<br>​
Brrunno [24]

Question: Why did the United States negotiate treaties with the Plains Indians?

Answer: In both the United States and Canada, negotiated treaties were the instrument for obtaining Indian lands and more generally for extending federal control over Native peoples, while at the same time recognizing the sovereignty they retained.

Explanation: I hope that this helps you! Hope you have a good day!

3 0
3 years ago
During the "meet and greet" portion of the interview, what should an applicant do?
Step2247 [10]
<span>The applicant should make eye contact with the interviewer, extend their hand for a friendly handshake, and only sit down when the interviewer prompts them to take a seat before the interview begins. The applicant should always have questions available, like "how many employees does the business currently employ?".</span>
5 0
2 years ago
Where is most of Canada's wheat grown
goldfiish [28.3K]

Saskatchewan, followed by Alberta and Manitoba.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the two Earliest Greek civilizations
kkurt [141]
Athenians Art Greco
8 0
2 years ago
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • In the Competency Based Leadership Model, Bennis suggests four actions or behaviors successful leaders employ. They are creating
    6·1 answer
  • Brandon got hypnotized at a student life activity as part of a performance. the crowd laughed as brandon was told by the hypnoti
    8·1 answer
  • Consider the following ethical argument. Which of the three statements represents the moral statement about a moral principle? S
    7·1 answer
  • The spatial and temporal environment (whether realistic or imagined) in which the narrative takes place is called
    11·1 answer
  • What is made up of usable amounts of metallic elements
    12·1 answer
  • Which effect is not a part of a competition within the free market system?
    14·2 answers
  • Can someone help me <br> And my product is high heels
    6·1 answer
  • in the film Batman, production designer Anton Furst used angled sets and lighting for a "film noir" effect that were further dis
    7·1 answer
  • Which ocean is closest to Kentucky
    8·2 answers
  • What is the length of a term of office for members of the us house of representatives
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!