Answer:When I was, oh, <em>around</em> eight years old, I thought it would be fun to learn to play the piano. My parents agreed to purchase a piano. They told me that I would be required to practice one hour a day, <em>due to the fact that </em>piano lessons were expensive. At first, I practiced piano for two hours each day, <em>with the result that</em> I progressed very rapidly. Every day for two years I raced home <em>when </em>school was done and practiced the piano with great enthusiasm. Then one day, something happened. I decided I liked baseball better than the piano. Though I can play the piano rather well <em>at the present time</em>, I do not practice as long nor as diligently as I once did.
Explanation:
Ms.Thayer visited our class today. Ms.Thayer is our town officer.
Explanation:
The behavior in a crowd which is dictated by the circumstances is called as the collective behavior, in which a person behaves according to the circumstances even if he or she is not willing to do that personally.
Yes i can remember a situation where i got stuck in a similar scenario. I was with my friends in the university after the classes in the executive hall, when a flash mob enters the hall and asked for raising the money for charity to help poor children with their studies. I personally didn't want to pay them a penny because i knew them well and i knew that they would not give a single penny in the charity for children studies. But i had to help them and give them money because of the circumstance over there, because they were yelling, forcing people, blackmailing people on the name of religion and helping poor, and because of this, i had to help them.
This was the time i was so dictated by the circumstances.
Answer:
Ethical problem
Explanation:
Every individual approaches ethical problem from his or her own perspective, which includes cultural values, moral upbringing, present circumstances, society’s expectations, and a multitude of few other variables.
Answer:
d. Either A or C
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that Big Corp will likely win if it can establish as a defense that either Pam was denied the promotion for legitimate non-discriminatory reasons or the denial of the promotion was based on mixed motives. Any of these two defenses would tell the court that there were other reasons as to why Pam was denied the promotion and it is not due to gender, which would make Pam's argument invalid.
