Answer:but-1-ene
Explanation:This is an E2 elimination reaction .
Kindly refer the attachment for complete reaction and products.
Sodium tert-butoxide is a bulky base and hence cannot approach the substrate 2-chlorobutane from the more substituted end and hence major product formed here would not be following zaitsev rule of elimination reaction.
Sodium tert-butoxide would approach from the less hindered side that is through the primary centre and hence would lead to the formation of 1-butene .The major product formed in this reaction would be 1-butene .
As the mechanism of the reaction is E-2 so it will be a concerted mechanism and as sodium tert-butoxide will start abstracting the primary hydrogen through the less hindered side simultaneously chlorine will start leaving. As the steric repulsion in this case is less hence the transition state is relatively stabilised and leads to the formation of a kinetic product 1-butene.
Kinetic product are formed when reactions are dependent upon rate and not on thermodynamical stability.
2-butene is more thermodynamically6 stable as compared to 1-butene
The major product formed does not follow the zaitsev rule of forming a more substituted alkene as sodium tert-butoxide cannot approach to abstract the secondary proton due to steric hindrance.
Wavelength is 6.976 x 10^ -35 m
Explanation:
In this, we can use De Broglie’s equation. This equation is the relationship between De Broglie’s wavelength, velocity and the mass of a moving object. In this equation, we are using plank's constant which is 6.626 x 10^-34 m^2 kg/s.
We know that one mile per hour is equivalent to 0.447 M/S.
And One gram is equivalent to 10^-3 kg.
De Broglie’s wavelength = λ ( wave length) = Plank’s constant/ Mass x velocity
λ ( wave length) = 6.626 x 10^ -34/ (425 x10^-3) x ( 50 x 0.447)
= 6.626 x 10^ -34/ 0. 425 x 22.35
= 6.626 x 10^ -34/ 9.498
= 6.976 x10^ -35 m
So, the wavelength of the football will be 6.976 x 10^ -35 m
Answer:
56.9 mmoles of acetate are required in this buffer
Explanation:
To solve this, we can think in the Henderson Hasselbach equation:
pH = pKa + log ([CH₃COO⁻] / [CH₃COOH])
To make the buffer we know:
CH₃COOH + H₂O ⇄ CH₃COO⁻ + H₃O⁺ Ka
We know that Ka from acetic acid is: 1.8×10⁻⁵
pKa = - log Ka
pKa = 4.74
We replace data:
5.5 = 4.74 + log ([acetate] / 10 mmol)
5.5 - 4.74 = log ([acetate] / 10 mmol)
0.755 = log ([acetate] / 10 mmol)
10⁰'⁷⁵⁵ = ([acetate] / 10 mmol)
5.69 = ([acetate] / 10 mmol)
5.69 . 10 = [acetate] → 56.9 mmoles
Answer:
a) The relationship at equivalence is that 1 mole of phosphoric acid will need three moles of sodium hydroxide.
b) 0.0035 mole
c) 0.166 M
Explanation:
Phosphoric acid is tripotic because it has 3 acidic hydrogen atom surrounding it.
The equation of the reaction is expressed as:
1 mole 3 mole
The relationship at equivalence is that 1 mole of phosphoric acid will need three moles of sodium hydroxide.
b) if 10.00 mL of a phosphoric acid solution required the addition of 17.50 mL of a 0.200 M NaOH(aq) to reach the endpoint; Then the molarity of the solution is calculated as follows
10 ml 17.50 ml
(x) M 0.200 M
Molarity = 
= 0.0035 mole
c) What was the molar concentration of phosphoric acid in the original stock solution?
By stoichiometry, converting moles of NaOH to H₃PO₄; we have
= 
= 0.00166 mole of H₃PO₄
Using the molarity equation to determine the molar concentration of phosphoric acid in the original stock solution; we have:
Molar Concentration = 
Molar Concentration = 
Molar Concentration = 0.166 M
∴ the molar concentration of phosphoric acid in the original stock solution = 0.166 M
