Answer:
Yes, there is evidence to support that claim that instructor 1 is more effective than instructor 2
Step-by-step explanation:
We can conduct a hypothesis test for the difference of 2 proportions. If there is no difference in instructor quality, then the difference in proportions will be zero. That makes the null hypothesis
H0: p1 - p2 = 0
The question is asking whether instructor 1 is more effective, so if he is, his proportion will be larger than instructor 2, so the difference would result in a positive number. This makes the alternate hypothesis
Ha: p1 - p2 > 0
This is a right tailed test (the > or < sign always point to the critical region like an arrowhead)
We will use a significance level of 95% to conduct our test. This makes the critical values for our test statistic: z > 1.645.
If our test statistic falls in this region, we will reject the null hypothesis.
<u>See the attached photo for the hypothesis test and conclusion</u>
Answer:
I belive the answer would be the first one. 2^28 x 3^20 x 9^4
Step-by-step explanation:
This is becasue you need to multiply the power on the outside of the parenthesis, (4). 7 times itself 4 times is 28, 5 times itself 4 times is 20, and then use the 4 for the 9. Hope this helps!
Answer:
The value under the radical is 3
Step-by-step explanation:
9^(2/3) This means 9 squared then find find the cube root of the answer.
9^(2/3)=∛(9^2 )
= ∛81
= ∛(3×3×3×3) = ∛(3)³ ₓ ∛3
= 3∛3
The value under the radical is 3
I hope this now shows clearly the number under the radical is 3.
BRAINLIEST?
For point (1, -2): -2 = -1 - 1 = -2. Therefore, point (1, -2) lies on the graph of the equation.
The graph of the equation is the set of points that are solutions to the equation.
A coordinate pair on the graph of the equation is a solution to the equation.
For the point (0, -1): -1 = -(0) - 1 = 0 - 1 = -1.
Therefore, The point ( 0, −1 ) lies on the graph of the equation.
Answer:
49
Step-by-step explanation:
count your options on the thang there are 7 dfrny seats and 7 different peps you do 7*7
