It’s physical something you can physically do
<u>ALL of the following work assumes NO AIR RESISTANCE:</u>
1). an object moving under the influence of only gravity, and not in orbit; its horizontal velocity is constant, and its vertical motion is accelerated downward at 9.8 m/s²
2). a parabola
3). Horizontal: velocity is constant, acceleration is zero. . . . Vertical: acceleration is 9.8 m/s² downward, velocity depends on whether it was launched, thrown up, thrown down, dropped, etc.
4). a). the one that was thrown horizontally; b). both hit the ground at the same time; c). both hit the ground with the same vertical velocity
5). a). zero; b). zero; c). gravity ... 9.8 m/s² down; d). 3.06 seconds; e). 4.38 m/s; f). 30 m/s g). no; gravity has no effect on horizontal motion
6). a). 1.8 seconds; b). 13.1 meters; c). 17.6 m/s down; d). 7.3 m/s; gravity has no effect on horizontal motion
7). 45 m/s
8). without air resistance, the ball is traveling horizontally at 13 km/hr, and it lands back in your hand
9). a). 4.49 m/s; b). 29.7 m/s
10). 7.24 meters
11). 700 meters
12). A). 103.7 meters ( ! she's in big trouble ! ); B). 17.5 meters
The radial velocity method preferentially detects large planets close to the central star
- what is the Radial velocity:
The radial velocity technique is able to detect planets around low-mass stars, such as M-type (red dwarf) stars.
This is due to the fact that low mass stars are more affected by the gravitational tug of planets.
When a planet orbits around a star, the star wobbles a little.
From this, we can determine the mass of the planet and its distance from the star.
hence we can say that,
option D is correct.
The radial velocity method preferentially detects large planets close to the central star
Learn more about radial velocity here:
<u>brainly.com/question/13117597</u>
#SPJ4
