The researcher's scientific/alternative hypothesis is:
- Different sources of caffeine leads to differences in women's attentional control performance.
The researcher's null hypothesis is:
- Different sources of caffeine leads to no difference in women's attentional control performance.
The type of sample which the researcher is using is:
A disadvantage to using this sample type is:
The thing which the researcher can conclude about these data is:
- It is conclusive based on the reaction of the women to the independent variables.
If, in the population, women actually show NO difference in attentional control performance after drinking black tea versus coffee, the type of statistical error which the researcher has made is:
<h3>What is a Scientific Hypothesis?</h3>
This refers to the difference between two variables which is discovered during a scientific research and is an observed pattern.
Read more about scientific hypothesis here:
brainly.com/question/896413
Answer:
0.1 for each case
Step-by-step explanation:
Because Jordan's teacher randomly calls on students and Jordan has 10% chance of being called on any given day, the probability that on the first day Jordan is called on is 0.1 Besides, the probability remains constant on any given day, so, the probability that on the 2nd day Jordan is called on is 0.1 and for the 5th day is the same 0.1 Probability is always a number between 0 and 1.
Answer:
640cm³
Step-by-step explanation:
Length SF = ×2
Volume SF = ×2³ = ×8
Volume of B = 8 × 80 = 640cm³
1 week = 7 days
1 gallon = 16 cups ⇒ 1 cup = 1/16 gallon
1.5 cups = 1.5 · 1/16 gallon = 15 · 1/160 gallon = 3/32 gallon
1.5 cups per day = 3/32 gallons per day = 7 · 3/32 gallons per week
= 21/32 gallons per week
Answer:
??????????????
Step-by-step explanation:
