All categories

3 years ago

Why is the quotient of 3 and 6 an ambiguous phrase?

Mathematics

1 answer:

Nezavi [6.7K]3 years ago

6 0

Because it does not specify the order and in division, the order matters.

You might be interested in

Write (8 x 10) + (6 x 1) +(2 x 0.1) + (7 x 0.001) with words.

aleksklad [387]

Answer:

Eight times ten plus six times one plus two times one-tenth plus seven times one-thousandth.

Step-by-step explanation:

(8 x 10) = eight times ten

(6 x 1) = six times one

(2 x 0.1) = two times one-tenth

(7 x 0.001) = seven times one-thousandth

I am not always the best with the equations to words stuff, so please comment if I am wrong!

4 0

1 year ago

What is the unit form for 10 x 3tens

Tems11 [23]

Answer:

3 hundreds

Step-by-step explanation:

10*3*10=300

unit for is 3 hundreds standard form is 300

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A Ski resort tracks the proportion of seasonal employees who are rehired each season. Rehiring a seasonal employee is beneficial

DaniilM [7]

The test statistic z will be equal to -0.946 and it shows that there is no significant difference in the proportion of rehires between full time and part time.

Given sample sizes of 833 and 386 and result of samples 434 and 189.

$n_{1} =833, n_{2}=386$

Proportion of full time=434/833=0.52

Proportion of part time=189/386=0.49.

Difference in proportion =0.52-0.49

$H_{0}:$ TTF- i∈ rho=0

$H_{1}:$ TTF+i∈ rho≠0.

Mean of difference=0.03

Z=(X-μ)/σ

σ= $\sqrt{0.4517/447}$

=0.0317

σ=0.0317

z=(0-0.03)/0.0317

=-0.03/0.0317

=-0.317

p value will be =0.1736.

Because p value is greater than 0.01 so we will accept the null hypothesis which shows that there is no significant difference in the proportions.

Hence there is no significant difference in the proportion of rehires between full time and part time.

Learn more about z test at brainly.com/question/14453510

#SPJ4

6 0

1 year ago

At 6:00 PM, a flagpole that is 35 feet tall casts a shadow that is 50 feet long. At the same time, how long will a person's shad

sertanlavr [38]

<u>Answer:</u>

The length of the person’s shadow is 5.7ft

<u>Explanation:</u>

Length of the flagpole =a= 35ft

Length of the shadow of the flagpole= b=50ft

Length of the person=c= 4ft

Suppose the length of the person’s shadow is=d

According to the rules of trigonometry

$\frac{\text { Length of the flagpole }}{\text { Length of the shadow of the flagpole }}=\frac{\text { Length of the person }}{\text { Length of the person's shadow }}$