Search all campaign finance data
Research federal election data and its relevance across the country.
Help for candidates and committees
Help for individuals and groups who are active in federal elections.
Research legal resources
Explore relevant statutes, regulations, Commission actions and court cases.
Answer:
One of the most common reasons that eminent domain cases are brought to court is over disputes about just compensation. The takings clause in the United States Constitution that established the government's power of eminent domain states
Answer:
The Juvenile Arresting Procedures Act
Explanation:
This federal law says that a Parent or Guardian is to be advised Immediately Upon arrest, also upon arrest, their Rights (Miranda rights) are to be read, and The "suspect" has must be told of his crimes.
Answer:
Yes <em>and</em> no.
Patrick <em>would</em> be liable for negligence in <em>allowing</em> the hail damage, as he <em>failed</em> to fulfill his duty of taking reasonable care of the vehicle.
However, he would<em> not</em> be responsible for the hot oil and gravel nicks.
In the case of Smith v Fifth Third Bank, regarding the <em><u>class action </u></em><em><u>lawsuit </u></em>settlement reached by the parties involved, we can confirm the settlement payment is that of 5.2 million dollars.
The case of Smith v Fifth Third Bank was a <u>class action </u><u>lawsuit</u>. A class-action suit is one in which the lawsuit is a collection of suits filed by <u>many parties, which are tried as a single case, and the parties in question are represented by </u><u>one member </u><u>or group of </u><u>members</u>.
In the case mentioned the lawsuit resulted in a settlement. This is when the party being sued <u>agrees to a payout in return for the charges being dropped. </u>It is said that the Bank in question created a settlement fund to pay the members involved, which held a total of 5.2 million dollars to be paid to the victims.
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/16108643?referrer=searchResults