He labeled the protein of bacteriophages with radioactive sulfur and their DNA with radioactive phosphorus. The bacteriophages were allowed to infect bacteria.
Fish and other aquatic life may have a harder time finding food as a result of algae blooms, and whole populations may move away or even perish as a result.
Thick, green muck produced by harmful algal blooms has an adverse effect on clear water, leisure activities, companies, and property values.
- The process of eutrophication, which happens when the environment becomes enriched with nutrients, increases the quantity of plant and algae development in estuaries and coastal waters, is what causes harmful algal blooms, dead zones, and fish kills.
- The excessive growth of algae in water bodies is referred to as eutrophication.
- Algal blooms are what are known as these phytoplankton masses or blooms.
- Blue-green algae blooms (also known as cyanobacteria, contaminated water supplies, and hypoxia are some of the known effects of cultural eutrophication.
Learn more about algae here:
brainly.com/question/11569246
#SPJ4
Answer:
Please find the explanation below
Explanation:
Transcription is the first process that occurs in protein synthesis. It involves the use of the stored information in the DNA molecule to synthesize a mRNA molecule.
Transcription, which occurs in the nucleus of eukaryotes and cytoplasm of prokaryotes, is catalyzed by an enzyme called RNA polymerase. RNA polymerase binds to the double-stranded DNA and begins to unwind it (Initiation). This unwinding causes the nucleotide bases to be exposed in order for the RNA polymerase enzyme to read.
The enzyme reads the bases of the DNA and begins to synthesize RNA nucleotides using the complementary base pairing rule (Elongation) i.e. Adenine base paired with Uracil base (RNA), and Guanine paired with Cytosine etc.
The single-stranded mRNA is released at the end of the transcription process (termination). This is basically what occurs in transcription.
Answer:
The community would be out of resources
Explanation:
the doubling of the rat would surely affect the resources of the community.
Answer:
The celebrity of the defendant, the other major players, and the case itself had, and continues to have, society as a whole discussing domestic violence and the effectiveness of our laws that deal with this area of criminal law. Since the commission of the crimes in June of 1994, the Simpson' case brought to the forefront the issue of what role evidence of prior domestic violence should play in criminal prosecutions. In addition to the forensic evidence which the Los Angeles prosecutors relied upon to attempt to convict Mr. Simpson, the theory of the prosecution's case rested on the proposition that Mr. Simpson committed the murders against his former wife, Nicole Brown Simpson (hereinafter Ms. Brown), and her friend, Ronald Goldman, because of jealousy, obsession, and the need to dominate Ms. Brown. The prosecution's case rested entirely upon circumstantial evidence, and as such, the prosecutors sought to introduce evidence of Mr. Simpson's past abusive conduct toward Ms. Brown to establish the identity of the perpetrator and his motives to commit the brutal crimes. The prosecution argued that the history of domestic violence and prior threats were probative evidence of Mr. Simpson's motive, intent, plan, and identity as the killer. According to Los Angeles District Attorney Gil Garcetti, the trial judge's ruling on the admissibility of this evidence was the "most critical ruling" that the Court would make in the case The prior conduct which the prosecution wanted to introduce on its direct case included acts of physical beatings upon Ms. Brown by Mr. Simpson, some of which were documented by photographs showing Ms. Brown's injuries. Other incidents included an episode in which Mr. Simpson had thrown Ms. Brown out of a moving car; a 1989 assault for which Ms. Brown had been hospitalized due to her injuries; Mr. Simpson's 1989 no contest plea to spousal abuse for which he was ordered to undergo counseling and pay a fine; letters of apology for the abuse written by Mr. Simpson to Ms. Brown; Mr. Simpson's repeated threats to kill Ms. Brown; a 1993 recording of a "911" telephone call made by Ms. Brown to the police, during which the voice of Mr. Simpson was heard making threats and shouting obscenities at Ms. Brown; evidence that Mr. Simpson was stalking Ms. Brown, and that shortly before her death, Ms. Brown had made contact with a battered women's shelter help-line; and many other instances of actual and threatened violence committed by Mr. Simpson against Ms. Brown dating back to 1977. In January 1995, Judge Lance Ito, who presided over the murder trial, ruled that much of the domestic violence history would be admissible on the prosecution's direct case, including the 1993 "911" tape-recorded telephone call by Ms. Brown. The evidence was admitted to provide the jury with an appreciation of the "nature and quality" of the relationship between Mr. Simpson anji Ms. Brown, and to aid in establishing motive, intent, plan, and identity of the killer.
