Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
Required
Write an inequality to represent the scenario?
Represent the additional number of pounds with p.
When p is added to the current pounds, the weight must be less than or equal to the total possible weights
In other words:
Substitute values for current and total
Hence, the inequality that describes the scenario is:
Algebra is number 3 - You have subtracted the measure of angle HKI from the equation.
Transitive property of equality is number 2 - Because both pairs of angles equal 180 degrees, you can set them equal to each other.
Definition of congruence is number 4 - The congruence symbol is in the equation, which tells you that the two angles are congruent.
Angles forming a linear pair sum to 180 degrees is number 1 - 180 degrees is in the equations given and the angles all form linear pairs.
Hope this helps!! :)
ANSWER
No, because there is no common ratio
EXPLANATION
The given sequence is
-1, 1, 4, 8
If this sequence is geometric, then there should be a common ratio among the consecutive terms.
Hence the sequence
-1, 1, 4, 8
is not a geometric sequence.
Answer:
<u>x = 50°</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
2x = 140 - 40
2x = 100
x = 100/2
<u>x = 50°</u>
The expression for g(x) is wrong, you skipped some signs and, apparentely, some parentheses. The rigtht expression for g(x) should be g(x) = 3(x+1) + 4. Note that g(x) = 3(x+1) + 4 it is the same that f(x+1) + 4. When you add a number to the argument, the graph of function is shifted that number of units to the left; and when you add a number to the function the graph shifts that number of units up. Therefore, the steps that will translate f(x) = 3x to g(x) = 3(x+1) + 4 is shift f(x) one unit to the left and four units up.
For the answer to the question on w<span>hich steps will translate f(x) = 3x to g(x) = 3x + 1 + 4? The answer to this question is
</span>f(x) = 3x one unit to the left and four units up
