Answer:
see below
Step-by-step explanation:
We can write the length as w + 8 and since area is length * width our answer is w * (w + 8) = w² + 8w.
For this case we must resolve the following inequality:
Adding 7 to both sides of the inequality:
Different signs are subtracted and the major sign is placed.
Thus, the solution is given by all the values of "x" less than -5.
The solution set is: (-∞, - 5)
Answer:
See attached image
Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
In this question, you roll 3 from the standard die and then add it with the next roll to see if the sums are greater than 4.
From this explanation you can see that you use the result from your first roll for the second event, so we can conclude that the event is dependent.
Imagine if we change the result of the first roll into 5, without adding the second roll we can know that the sum will be greater than 4. The first event result will influence the second event, so it is a dependent event.
Well, there isn’t really an end for numbers...
However; The biggest number referred to regularly is a googolplex (10googol), which works out as 1010^100. That isn’t the end to numbers but it is a huge one. We will replace that with ‘all the numbers in the world’.
106 is the exponent equivalent to 1 million
So your question would be:
106 x 1010^100 =
However I don’t believe there is a calculator that large.
B- -3
If x is two according to the coordinate points, that means the equation is now -8+3y=-17
Add 8 to each side- 3y=-9
And divide -9 by 3
This gets you y=-3