Answer:
t=v/d
Step-by-step explanation:
id think that there are two steps
v=d/t
divide D on both sides
v/d=d/t/d
v/d=t
We compute for the side lengths using the distance formula √[(x₂-x₁)²+(y₂-y₁)²].
AB = √[(-7--5)²+(4-7)²] = √13
A'B' = √[(-9--7)²+(0-3)²] = √13
BC = √[(-5--3)²+(7-4)²] = √13
B'C' = √[(-7--5)²+(3-0)²] =√13
CD = √[(-3--5)²+(4-1)²] = √13
C'D' = √[(-5--7)²+(0--3)²] = √13
DA = √[(-5--7)²+(1-4)²] = √13
D'A' = √[(-7--9)²+(-3-0)²] = √13
The two polygons are squares with the same side lengths.
But this is not enough information to support the argument that the two figures are congruent. In order for the two to be congruent, they must satisfy all conditions:
1. They have the same number of sides.
2. All the corresponding sides have equal length.
3. All the corresponding interior angles have the same measurements.
The third condition was not proven.
Im guessing it would be about 50 degrees
A prime number is a number that has only two factors: 1 and itself
For example, the number 7 has two factors: 1,7 This makes 7 a prime number
Since the number has to be greater than 50, we can go to the next whole number; 51
51 has four factors, 1,3,17,51 This is not our prime number
52 is even so obviously it's not prime because you can divide by two
53 has only two factors; 1,53 This means that its prime and the answer is 53 :)
If you have any questions feel free to ask
Answer:
1. The first problem is wrong, it should be 0.5(3(15) + 2(20)) because the parentheses make sure that every purchased item is being divided by 2 (multiplying by 0.5 is the same as dividing by 2)
2. The second problem is partially correct. The first two answers you have checked are correct, but the last one is wrong. The third answer should be 6 + 12 instead because that's just a simplified version of 2(3) + 6(2), meaning they are equal
3. I cannot read your answers in the "Why or Why Not" column in the third problem, but the answers you gave in the "Evaluate" and "Does It Work?" columns are all correct.
