1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vekshin1
3 years ago
13

Inc.

Law
1 answer:
mihalych1998 [28]3 years ago
3 0

1.Margret can say as she was in a hurry that's why the mistake took place.

Explanation:

Margret can say that as she had to avail another connecting flight thus she was in a hurry , so my mistake instead of taking her laptop he took someone else. If they want to know regarding the matter they can go to the airport and can check the lost list. After knowing the fact Margret must have informed it to the airport.

2.Success rate is more in case of Margret case.

Explanation:

Prosecutors as well as police don't charge cases until and unless they get proper evidence of that particular incidents. According to the prosecutors until and unless more evidence occur the accused cannot be convicted.

You might be interested in
While the CSI team is searching the crime scene,
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]

Answer:

if you’re asking if that’s is cross contamination then your answer is yes

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
Why is the peaceful transfer of power considered to be one of the most important aspects of democracy?
blondinia [14]

Answer: Democracy allows people to choose their leaders and the leaders get the powers to run the government.

Explanation:

The peaceful transfer of power is considered important in democracy. In this the powers or leadership is smoothly handed over to the newly elected or selected members of the population. This results after the election or the during transmission of powers to different political regime.

4 0
3 years ago
Why should the state provide free legal assistance to those<br>charged with really serious crimes?​
viktelen [127]

Access to justice is now more critical than ever. within the u. s., Americans need a lawyer’s help for everything from avoiding an unjust eviction to preventing a wrongful conviction. Yet, effective legal assistance remains out of reach for the bulk of american citizens. The gap between legal needs and also the services available exacerbates systemic inequities and downsides that may only grow over the subsequent four years. This series examines the state of access to justice within the u. s. and the way public and personal actors can collaborate to create justice equal for all Americans.

For two years, Mary Hicks paid $975 per month for a run-down Washington, D.C., apartment. When she contacted the owner about mold and mildew within the bathroom and holes within the walls, he did nothing. After Mary began to withhold rent, her landlord sued her.

Mary sought help from a law clinic. Her student attorneys not only kept her from being evicted and ensured that her landlord made the repairs but also reduced her rent to $480 after discovering that her unit was rent-controlled.1

Mary was fortunate. While 90 to 95 percent of landlords are represented by lawyers before the owner and Tenant Branch of the D.C. judicature, only 5 to 10 percent of tenants have legal assistance.2 Unlike criminal defendants, parties in civil cases don't have a generalized right to counsel. While all states provide a right to counsel for a minimum of some styles of civil cases, most parties in civil cases that involve high stakes and basic human needs, like housing, don't have a right to representation.3

In more than three-fourths of all civil trial cases within the u. s., a minimum of one litigant doesn't have a lawyer.4 Figures are even starker when it involves family law, violence, housing, and small-claims matters—those involving disputes over amounts up to $25,000, betting on the state. a minimum of one party lacks representation in 70 to 98 percent of those cases.5

And these are just the Americans who make it to court. Without access to legal advice, many are unaware of their legal rights and potential claims. Past estimates and more moderen state-by-state studies suggest that about 80 percent of the civil legal needs of these living in poverty go unmet6 in addition as 40 to 60 percent of the requirements of middle-income Americans.7 But because these figures rely upon self-selection and self-reporting, however, and since many Americans don't identify their unmet legal needs in and of itself, it's impossible to estimate Americans’ total unmet legal needs.8

To deny Americans access to legal assistance is to deny them their rights and protections. this can be because, to a greater degree than other countries, the u. s. places the burden on a private to hunt justice by visiting court.9 Other developed democracies have enshrined the proper to counsel in civil cases and devote 3 to 10 times more funding to civil legal aid than the u. s..10 In areas from environmental regulation and workplace discrimination to civil rights and housing, Americans must hire or find their own attorneys to enforce the law. The result's a divide between those that can afford legal assistance and people who cannot.

This issue brief is that the first during a series that examines access to justice as a long-neglected policy concern integral to American democracy—one that's under threat from the approaching administration.11 It provides important information on the U.S. justice gap and makes the case for prioritizing improvements in civil aid and indigent defense through legislative and infrastructure initiatives. It also outlines steps that state legislators, courts, and out of doors actors, like advocacy organizations, can desire make justice equal.

6 0
3 years ago
Who likes to rppppppppppppppppppppppppppp
coldgirl [10]

Answer:

Thats a lotta p's

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How do lobbyists differ from political action committees (PACs)?
Rainbow [258]

Answer:

A lobbyist is a professional whose job is to make contacts with influential people in Washington (or whatever government) and make a case on behalf of a client. They're regulated under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995. If you're spending most of your time chatting with Congressmen, then you need to file forms saying who you're talking to and on whose behalf. These forms are filed with the clerks in the House and the Senate.

While a Political Action Committee (PAC) is a group of people with some kind of interest. They collect money and spend it to promote that interest. They have to file forms, with the Federal Election Commission rather than with the legislative branch, though unlike the lobbyists they have ways to not disclose who's giving them money. They can hold public meetings, buy TV advertising, donate money to causes, give money to candidates (a small amount- about $5k to candidates and $15k to parties), and hire lobbyists.

Generally, when a PAC hires a lobbyist, the lobbyist is the one to go to the legislator and make the case on behalf of the PAC. They may also bring the PAC's own team to make the presentation, but they need to be very careful about crossing the (byzantine) set of rules trying to keep the ethical lines clear-ish. Conceivably, they could have lobbyists on staff, but it exposes the entire organization to levels of disclosure that they'd generally rather not have. Thus, the usual plan is for a PAC to hire an established lobbying firm, who is already registered and prepared to handle the paperwork.

Explanation:

Hope this helped :)

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1. What areas do you feel States should govern(make laws for)? Why those areas?
    8·1 answer
  • The right to due process means that the government:
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following units of local government has home rule status under t<br>Constitution?​
    13·1 answer
  • What are the names of the 7major UK parties who were campaigning to win the election
    5·1 answer
  • What would happen if you fake a credit card number online on a website.
    11·1 answer
  • Why does robbery consist of the crimes theft and assault?
    10·1 answer
  • “Classical theory” is one of the earliest criminological theories, and argues that people choose to commit a crime out of their
    13·1 answer
  • Do you support a second impeachment trial?
    12·2 answers
  • What is the main advantage of the council-manager form of government over the mayor-council form of government?
    12·2 answers
  • PLEASE I NEED HELP ASAP!!!
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!