1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
konstantin123 [22]
3 years ago
14

A Roth IRA and a Tax Deferred investment plan are just two of many ways you can invest into for your retirement. If you wanted t

o contribute amounts greater than $5,000 a year, which of the two investment plans would you consider and why?
Business
2 answers:
UNO [17]3 years ago
8 0

If an amount greater than $5,000 is made on an annual bases, then the Tax Deferred Annuity will be the best investment plan. A Roth IRA will only allow a maximum of $5,000 to be deposited annually, where as the Tax Deferred Annuity has no contribution limit.

Firdavs [7]3 years ago
7 0
<span>If I want to contribute amounts greater than $5,000 on an annual bases, I would consider the Tax Deferred Investment Plan; the Tax Deferred Annuity most suitable in this situation because a Roth IRA has a contribution limit of $5,000 annually, whereas the Tax Deferred Investment Plan has no contribution limit.</span>
You might be interested in
Summarize the consequentialist arguments for and against affirmative action.
bearhunter [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

Arguments supporting Affirmative Action:

1) Affirmative action is a method that ensure the diversity is obtained and maintained in schools and workplaces. Moreover, it also helps to create tolerant communities therefore, it exposes people to a variety of cultures and ideas that are different from their own.

2)Affirmative action assists disadvantaged people that come from areas of the country where opportunities are limited  be able to advance and they otherwise could not. In other words, it bestows everybody the same playing field.

3)Affirmative action is for  to help by compensating to some races who are"started late in the race" , due to many years of oppression, and it also helps level the playing field.

Arguments against Affirmative Action:

1) Affirmative Action can be described as reverse discrimination. More specifically, past discrimination against some minority groups does not justify existing discrimination against them.

2) It weakens the notion of meritocracy and instead weakens races as a dominant factor in recruitment and recruitment procedures. Regardless of the situation, the best people for the position should be placed there.

3) Students / staff involved in the approval process are often not fully prepared for the assignment.

4) Affirmative Action strengthens stereotypes and racism compared to the previous point. People who give a position almost positively because of their activity are often unsuitable and the idea that all people in this race are "stupid" is endless.

5) People of different races or ethnic backgrounds do not need to have differences of opinion in the workplace / university. People with the same skin color are not necessarily the same in terms of vision or culture.

4 0
3 years ago
In reviewing the accounting records of the transportation services fund, an internal service fund of douglas city, you notice th
zubka84 [21]

The reason why the fund uses the budgetary accounts because it is most likely needed that the funding budget to be approved legally by the city council in order for the budget funds to be used by the members or people responsible of handling the budgets.

5 0
4 years ago
Which network signaling method uses digital signals and consumes the entire available bandwidth of the network media as a single
satela [25.4K]
Verizon ?............
6 0
3 years ago
Gift Finder
Katyanochek1 [597]

Answer:

Hi, I found a gift hope u like it

Explanation:

IT'S ON AMAZON

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Bank Robbery. Victor robbed Safe Bank of a significant sum of cash. Safe Bank offered a reward of $10,000 for anyone who capture
algol13

Answer: E

Explanation: Ted or Ursula didn't get the reward because Ursula was also a suspect. during the course of Ted investigation information gotten from Ursula interrogating helped in apprehending him. Ted was performing his duties as an officer of the law, Ursula was a suspect so couldn't claim the reward too.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • ______________ organizations scatter it components in different locations to address local business needs.
    13·1 answer
  • Which research method involves manipulating a variable in order to determine how it affects another variable (in a cause and eff
    5·1 answer
  • Many people are familiar with swot analysis—analyzing strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats—which is used to aid in
    11·1 answer
  • The nation of Textilia does not allow imports of clothing. In its equilibrium without trade, a T-shirt costs $24, and the equili
    13·1 answer
  • Gus, the general manager at Fireball Manufacturing, has to deliver a negative performance evaluation to Tina, a customer service
    10·1 answer
  • A entry to a liability account decreases the account balance
    5·1 answer
  • Suppose that disposable income, consumption, and saving in some country are $200 billion, $150 billion, and $50 billion, respect
    11·1 answer
  • A city assesses property owners $50 million to extend sewer lines to their neighborhood. By year-end, however, it has not begun
    5·1 answer
  • Find the sum of 2x kg and 5x g. Give the answer in grammes.​
    13·1 answer
  • Cage company had net income of $365 million and average total assets of $2,040 million. its return on assets (roa) is?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!