Answer:
<h3>The best interpretation of this equation 4x=3x is that the equation has no solution</h3>
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that Kate begins solving the equation
![\frac{2}{3}(6x-3)=\frac{1}{2}(6x-4)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%286x-3%29%3D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%286x-4%29)
<h3>To find the best interpretation of the given equation :</h3><h3>Katie's steps are</h3>
When she adds 2 to both sides, the equation becomes
Therefore ![4\neq 3](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=4%5Cneq%203)
<h3>Therefore the given equation has no solution </h3><h3>The best interpretation of this equation 4x=3x is that the equation has no solution.</h3><h3>Therefore the option no solution is correct</h3>
Answer:
0.0378
Step-by-step explanation:
#;+*($$&#(#'#)#&#)#&#-#)#8#&2'#;$7$5$&
Answer:
I am pretty sure the answer would be $107.31. Sorry if I'm wrong.
Step-by-step explanation:
First you take the total of the 3 DVD's (45.99) and you divide that by 3 (number of DVD's) to get 15.33 which is called the unit price. Then, you take your unit price and multiply that by how many items you are going to buy.
45.99 / 3 = 15.33
15.33 x 7 = 107.31
No, apparently it can not.