The correct answer is Plessy Vs. Ferguson. In the landmark case Plessy vs. Ferguson, it was ruled that segregation of facilities was constitutional as long as those facilities were equal in quality. This is were the term "Separate but Equal" comes from. However, during the case Brown vs. The Board of Education it was ruled that racial segregation violated the fourteenth amendment of the Constitution. It was this ruling that rendered the ruling in Plessy vs. Ferguson invalid because the ruling was unconstitutional.
Answer:
<h3 />
<h3>Following words have been edited in the passage :</h3>
<h3>On reaching his room he \Large{\bcancel{entire} \:entirely} </h3><h3>entire</h3><h3> entirely broke down, and became prey to the most violent \Large{\bcancel{agitation} \:agitations} </h3><h3>agitation</h3>
<h3> agitations .The vulgarity of those twins, and the gross materialism of Mrs. Otis,\Large{\bcancel{was} \:were} </h3><h3>was</h3><h3> were naturally extremely annoying, but what really \Large{\bcancel{distress} \:distressed} </h3><h3>distress</h3><h3> distressed him most was that he had been unable to wear the suit of mail.</h3>
I feel like it would be the flood season because it was going on for 5 months and many people could have been hurt during that time
Additionally is the answer your looking for :)
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option D (Fundamental attribution error).
Explanation:
A common method of prejudice throughout cognitive psychology seems to be the fundamental attribution mistake or error.
- Fundamentally, it includes putting a greater emphasis on administrative traits of appearance to clarify the actions, someone, in a particular circumstance, instead of always worrying about actual physical subjective.
- Humans appear to over-emphasize qualitative even persona-based interpretations of actions found in others often under-emphasizing situational interpretations.
Therefore, the given statement illustrates the above error.
