Answer: B, (embargo)
Explanation:
The Embargo Act of 1807 was an attempt by President Thomas Jefferson and the U.S. Congress to prohibit American ships from trading in foreign ports. It was intended to punish Britain and France for interfering with American trade while the two major European powers were at war with each other.
Explanation:
The problem is the simple fact that the less fortunate are denied access to school and education while the few others are previlaged and able to have accsess to education. This causes a problem statiing you can only get education if you have the means to afford, accomadate and sustain it. Ex Job instead of home work, etc. Solving this issue would be very difficault but offering some tyoe of extra support to the ones struggling would be the only way. Hope this helps
Answer:
Federal system
Explanation:
A federal system of government exercises a division between three types of government: national, state, and local. Under this principle, known as federalism, every single level of government is sovereign in some areas and shares authority in other areas. A clear example of this is the shared authority of federal and state governments, both of which can levy taxes.
He was <span>mutually jealous, and suspicious of any central taxing authority. hope that helps :D</span>
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Although the leaders of two enemy nations admit to a buildup of their own military forces, each sees the other country's actions as unreasonable and motivated by evil intentions. This situation best illustrates:
the mere exposure effect.
the just-world phenomenon.
mirror-image perceptions.
deindividuation.
social facilitation.
None of the listed answers are correct
Answer:
This situation best illustrates mirror-image perceptions.
Explanation:
The term mirror-image perception refers to the human tendency of viewing others as the enemy, as evil, especially in a situation of conflict. It is called mirror-image because both people or sides involved in the conflict see themselves as good, and the other as the villain. That is precisely the case described in the passage. Both leaders do not see a problem concerning their own buildup of their military forces - they "know" they are doing it for good reasons. But both of them also think that the other leader doing it is a sign of evil intentions on his part.
