An integer may be a multiple of 3.
An integer may be 1 greater than a multiple of 3.
An integer may be 2 greater than a multiple of 3.
It is redundant to say an integer is 3 greater than a multiple of 3 (that's just a multiple of 3, we've got it covered). Same for 4, 5, 6, 7...
Let's consider a number which is a multiple of 3. Clearly, we can write 3+3+3+3+... until we reach the number. It can be written as only 3's.
Let's consider a number which is 2 greater than a multiple of 3. If we subtract 5 from that number, it'll be a multiple of 3. That means we can write the number as 5+3+3+3+3+... Of course, the number must be at least 8.
Let's consider a number which is 1 greater than a multiple of 3. If we subtract 5 from that number, it'll be 2 greater than a multiple of 3. If we subtract another 5, it'll be a multiple of 3. That means we can write the number as 5+5+3+3+3+3+... Of course, the number must be at least 13.
That's it. We considered all the numbers. We forgot 9, 10, 11, and 12, but these are easy peasy.
Beautiful question.
question isn't loading
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
A. 1/5k - 2/3j and -2/3j +1/5k
Step-by-step explanation:
A. 1/5k - 2/3j and -2/3j +1/5k
B. 1/5k - 2/3j and -1/5k +2/3j
There is a change in the signs of each term
1/5k changed to -1/5k
-2/3j changed to +2/3j
Not equivalent
C. 1/5k - 2/3j and 1/5j - 2/3k
There is a change in the variables
1/5k changed to 1/5j
-2/3j changed to -2/3k
D. 1/5k - 2/3j and 2/3j - 1/5k
The is a change in the signs of each term
1/5k changed to -1/5k
-2/3j changed to +2/3j
The only equivalent expression is
A. 1/5k - 2/3j and -2/3j +1/5k
So C= dxpi or rx2xpi= c in this case 7x 2 = 14 is diameter do E D and A finds the diameter and the rest do not
