The result that should be established is in the form
y = f(x)
where x, the amount of sunlight is the controlled (independent) variable,
y = height (growth) that corresponds to the amount of sunlight. Therefore y depends on x.
Clearly,
x, the amount of sunlight is the independent variable. It can be controlled.
y, the measured amount of growth is the dependent variable.
Answer:
The independent variable is the amount of sunlight.
The dependent variable is the growth.
Answer:
2.7067 eV
Explanation:
h = Planck's constant = 
c = Speed of light = 
= Threshold wavelength = 459 nm
Work function is given by
Converting to eV
The work function W0 of this metal is 2.7067 eV
I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.
Answer:
1 mole of H2O is 18 grams (2 g H + 16 g Oxygen)
36 / 18 = 2
So 2 moles = 2 * 6.02E23 = 12.04E23 = 1.204E24
Answer:
your question in not complete.
you need to the high too.
